2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
100
2
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
100
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the literature on place attachment and pro-environmental behaviours, a number of studies have demonstrated significant associations between these two constructs in different contexts and situations (e.g., Devine-Wright & Howes, 2010;Gosling & Williams, 2010;Halpenny, 2010;Hernández et al, 2010;Raymond et al, 2011). While some studies have suggested that higher levels of place attachment are associated with lower intentions to engage in pro-environmental behaviours (Uzzell, Pol, & Badenas, 2002), other researchers have found that the opposite is also possible (Vaske & Kobrin, 2001).…”
Section: Place Attachment and Pro-environmental Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the literature on place attachment and pro-environmental behaviours, a number of studies have demonstrated significant associations between these two constructs in different contexts and situations (e.g., Devine-Wright & Howes, 2010;Gosling & Williams, 2010;Halpenny, 2010;Hernández et al, 2010;Raymond et al, 2011). While some studies have suggested that higher levels of place attachment are associated with lower intentions to engage in pro-environmental behaviours (Uzzell, Pol, & Badenas, 2002), other researchers have found that the opposite is also possible (Vaske & Kobrin, 2001).…”
Section: Place Attachment and Pro-environmental Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have demonstrated significant associations between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviours of individuals (e.g., Devine-Wright & Howes, 2010;Gosling & Williams, 2010;Halpenny, 2010;Hernández, Martin, Ruiz, & Hidalgo, 2010;Raymond et al, 2011). Pro-environmental behaviour is defined as an action by an individual or group that promotes or results in the sustainable use of natural resources (Sivek & Hungerford, 1989/1990.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have demonstrated significant associations between these two constructs in different contexts and situations (e.g., Devine-Wright & Howes, 2010;Gosling & Williams, 2010;Halpenny, 2010;Hernandez, et al, 2010;Raymond et al, 2011). Visitors with high levels of place dependence were found to be more concerned with resource development and maintenance while those with high levels of place identity were keener to maintain and protect the primitive settings of a place.…”
Section: Place Attachment and Pro-environmental Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raymond et al, (2011) investigated the relationship between place attachment, moral and normative concerns and conservation of native vegetation using multiple regression. Hernandez, Martin, Ruiz, & Hidalgo (2010) used structural equation modelling (SEM) to analyse the relationship between place attachment, place identity and environmental attitudes in investigating environmental protection laws. Gosling and Williams explored the relationship between place attachment, connectedness to nature and proenvironmental behaviour using a series of regression analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://cgjsc-rcessc.uwaterloo.ca groups construct their sense of selfhood from places (Stedman, 2002(Stedman, , 2003Kyle et al, 2004;Hernández et al, 2007;Hernández et al, 2010). 'Place-myths' play a significant role in social spatialization (Shields, 1991), which may conflict with the branding of the place that is sustained and carried out by entrepreneur coalitions and business interests, local governments, and media (Greenberg, 2008; see also Jayne, 2006).…”
Section: Theorizing Placementioning
confidence: 99%