1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00731112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of plastic void growth in the fracture of rubber-toughened epoxy polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the observation of the micrographs in Figure 3 it is possible to note the presence of a non-homogeneous void size distribution, with some of the voids larger than the nanorubber diameter (CNBR-NP, 50-100 nm or NBR-NP, 100-150 nm). This fact proves that the debonding mechanism follows a plastic void growth, which is major energy dissipation and hence a toughening micro mechanism [32]. Rubber nano particle debond- ing from the resin matrix occurs at the particle-matrix interface, therefore reducing the degree of stresses acting in the matrix adjacent to the particles.…”
Section: Figure 1 Manufacturing Techniques Used In This Studymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…From the observation of the micrographs in Figure 3 it is possible to note the presence of a non-homogeneous void size distribution, with some of the voids larger than the nanorubber diameter (CNBR-NP, 50-100 nm or NBR-NP, 100-150 nm). This fact proves that the debonding mechanism follows a plastic void growth, which is major energy dissipation and hence a toughening micro mechanism [32]. Rubber nano particle debond- ing from the resin matrix occurs at the particle-matrix interface, therefore reducing the degree of stresses acting in the matrix adjacent to the particles.…”
Section: Figure 1 Manufacturing Techniques Used In This Studymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The energy released by cavitation is negligible and does not contribute to the toughening directly but makes it easy for the matrix to deform plastically, as proven by Bagheri and Pearson et al who found that the toughening efficiency is similar for rubbers with different cavitation resistance and pre-formed voids, which did not involve any cavitation energy [33]. Rubber cavitation, however, is usually followed by plastic void growth extending to the matrix and local shear yielding [34], both of which are believed to be primary toughening mechanisms in rubber filled epoxy. The irreversible plastic void-growth in the matrix dissipates energy and contributes to the enhanced fracture energy, and the local shear yielding can promote plastic deformation in the matrix, which also improves the fracture energy [35].…”
Section: Fracture Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hole, growth in the epoxy matrix to occur 13 . Indeed, this is why the void in Figure 5 has not 'closed up', but it clearly visible as an 'open' microcrack.…”
Section: Matrix Plastic Yielding and Particle Cavitationmentioning
confidence: 99%