2020
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1708186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of populist attitudes in explaining climate change skepticism and support for environmental protection

Abstract: Conventional wisdom holds that partisanship and political ideology, writ large, are some of the most powerful explanations of attitudes towards climate change and environmental politics. While compelling, most studies focus on a narrow definition of political ideology in the US. This study adds to the literature by assessing the relationship between populism, climate skepticism, and support for environmental protection. Populism offers an orthogonal dimension to partisanship and left-right self-placement, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
88
1
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
88
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to this, this study has attempted to also assess the influence of populism and political ideology separately, and results were insignificant (see Annex C). What this shows overall is that, although political ideology and populist attitudes are strong predictors of climate change attitudes at the individual level (Huber, 2020;Huber et al, 2020;McCright et al, 2016), we do not see that country-level shifts to the (populist) right are so strongly associated with decreased concern both between and within countries. A reason for this could be that climate skeptic stances of right-wing populist parties are counteracted by a stronger mobilization of pro-climate movements influencing public attitudes (Caniglia et al, 2015;Hagedorn et al, 2019), but researching this is beyond the scope of this study and should provide fruitful inspiration for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In response to this, this study has attempted to also assess the influence of populism and political ideology separately, and results were insignificant (see Annex C). What this shows overall is that, although political ideology and populist attitudes are strong predictors of climate change attitudes at the individual level (Huber, 2020;Huber et al, 2020;McCright et al, 2016), we do not see that country-level shifts to the (populist) right are so strongly associated with decreased concern both between and within countries. A reason for this could be that climate skeptic stances of right-wing populist parties are counteracted by a stronger mobilization of pro-climate movements influencing public attitudes (Caniglia et al, 2015;Hagedorn et al, 2019), but researching this is beyond the scope of this study and should provide fruitful inspiration for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…To address these shortcomings, three robustness checks that aimed to reduce these flaws have been performed and the results were not notably different; only the negative longitudinal effect is sometimes significant (explanations and results of these robustness checks are available in Annex C of the Supplementary Online Material). In addition, although researching the links between right-wing populism and climate change has been done previously in the literature (Ćetković & Hagemann, 2020;Lockwood, 2018), one could criticize the conflation of populism and political ideology from an analytical point of view, because results could be due to either the populism component, the ideological component, or a combination of both (Huber, 2020). In response to this, this study has attempted to also assess the influence of populism and political ideology separately, and results were insignificant (see Annex C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations