2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of post–radiation therapy fdg pet in prediction of necessity for post–radiation therapy neck dissection in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] It has also been shown in several studies to have higher predictive values than CT and/or MRI, 21,27,32,33 and better than combined clinical examination and ultrasound. 31 Finally, studies have found that co-registering PET and CT (PET-CT) is even more accurate than PET alone 33,34 ( Table 1).…”
Section: 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] It has also been shown in several studies to have higher predictive values than CT and/or MRI, 21,27,32,33 and better than combined clinical examination and ultrasound. 31 Finally, studies have found that co-registering PET and CT (PET-CT) is even more accurate than PET alone 33,34 ( Table 1).…”
Section: 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have demonstrated the very high negative predictive value of PET/CT in posttherapy assessment of head and neck malignancy (Fig 7). 30,37,38,[43][44][45][46] Porceddu et al 38 demonstrated that a negative PET/CT result is highly reliable when PET/CT is performed at least 2-3 months after the completion of therapy. In this study, 39 eligible patients who had a residual mass in the head and neck underwent PET scanning at a median of 12 weeks (range, 8 -32 weeks) after therapy.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Therapy Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 In the setting of surveillance, numerous studies have demonstrated that 18 F-FDG-PET/CT has a relatively high sensitivity for detecting recurrent disease at the primary tumor site and regional lymph node metastases. 37,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][49][50][51][52] For patients who underwent PET or PET/CT at least 12 weeks after the completion of all therapy, the reported sensitivity ranged between 90% and 100% for the detection of recurrence. Due to nonspecific inflammatory uptake, the specificity of PET and PET/CT is between 63% and 94%, and a tissue biopsy or shortinterval repeat scanning is warranted.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Recurrence and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of follow-up PET/CT for patient outcome, and the added value to the clinical assessment, are not fully established. Previous studies (11,(19)(20)(21) have shown the prognostic significance of follow-up PET or PET/CT performed within 1 y after the completion of therapy. A recent study demonstrated the temporal patterns of HNSCC recurrence with 18 F-FDG PET/CT and concluded that PET/CT detected 73 asymptomatic recurrences in 110 patients with recurrence, with 95% of the observed recurrences being detected within 24 mo (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%