The role of practical assessment in the delivery of successful enterprise education

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to concentrate on how assessment is used to support the aims of enterprise education leading to recommendations for improvements to the current approach to the assessment of enterprise. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a review of entrepreneurship education literature and a qualitative case study conducted on a sample of enterprise educators at University of the West of Scotland. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings Paradoxically, the traditional enterprise education paradigm harms that which it attempts to nurture: entrepreneurial thinking and activity. The rationalised approach to education conflicts with the aims of enterprise educators, and there is evidence of a visible and growing disconnect between academia (the theory) and industry (the practice). Research limitations/implications The work is limited as it concentrates on a single case study. The qualitative approach focusses on a specific social field and therefore the findings cannot be generalised to other settings. These limitations can be addressed in future research. Practical implications This work has resonance for enterprise educators delivering and assessing entrepreneurial learning in an academic setting and will also be of interest to decision makers within this sector concerned with ensuring academic practice remains aligned to policy and industry requirements. Originality/value Enterprise education is well researched; however, there is a gap in the area of enterprise assessment which is under researched and not well understood.

Fail fast, fail often…but don’t fail this course! Business and enterprise education through the lens of theatre and the creative arts

“…Its emergence may be attributed to the acknowledgement of the need to differentiate between business education and entrepreneurship/ enterprise; the latter being more concerned with motivating students towards a propensity for creativity and innovation (Turner and Mulholland, 2017). Hytti and O'Gorman (2004) outline the distinction between entrepreneurship education and what they describe as 'traditional' management studies, although it is observed that there remains somewhat of a business school bias towards the promotion of business venturing (Fayolle et al, 2006;Herrmann, 2008;Murray, 2019) and this has resulted in some scholars questioning key tenets associated with traditional approaches to enterprise and entrepreneurship: '[ . .…”

Assessment as A Pedagogy and Measuring Tool in Promoting Deep Learning In Institutions of Higher Learning

“…The central goal of higher education centres on the growth and development of students more than the number who complete their degrees. The quality of education involves critical factors such as pedagogical instruction and the content of what is taught and learnt, with assessment playing a key role as a pillar to deep learning (Murray, 2019). The theoretical underpinnings of assessment in higher education focus attention on how to measure the quality of what is taught, what students learn and how to ascertain that learning has taken place.…”

“…The concept of constructive alignment is based on a belief that diverse and larger classes create difficulty in maintaining academic standards, with an existing nexus between teaching and learning and assessment (Biggs, 1999;Murray, 2019). It is contended that when all components are aligned the students can achieve high order learning.…”

“…Multi-purpose higher education institutions are pluralistic in nature because of varied functions that need to be carried out. They are not expected to operate as silos because of a symbiotic relationship held with the work environment, public sector and society that shapes what is offered (Cleote & Maasen, 2015;Murray, 2019). The institutions serve as producers of skilled workers and producers of scientific knowledge, including the function of being repositories and organisers of knowledge.…”

Witnessing entrepreneurial perceptions and proclivity in university students

“…(Inspired by Liñán et al, 2011;Marques et al, 2012;Eid et al, 2019) Throughout the course of this journey, the student is exposed to curricular and cocurricular interventions which are grounded in the principles of both practical and valuable entrepreneurial learning (see Murray, 2019b). If successful, the destination for the journey is employment for the graduate who is equipped with the range of competencies.…”