2012
DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.3.606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Preferences and Opportunity Costs in Determining the Time Allocated to Housework

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Heterogeneity across couples in housework time allocation may also exist due to individual/couple-specific preferences regarding household production tasks and gender role attitudes. Research suggests that such couplespecific factors do matter (see Stratton 2012 for evidence regarding preferences, and Greenstein 1996and 2000, Cunningham 2008, and Baxter and Hewitt 2013 for evidence regarding attitudes). These complications mean that a clean identification of the 'spousal power effect' on the intra-household division of unpaid labor using cross-sectional data has been elusive.…”
Section: In Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity across couples in housework time allocation may also exist due to individual/couple-specific preferences regarding household production tasks and gender role attitudes. Research suggests that such couplespecific factors do matter (see Stratton 2012 for evidence regarding preferences, and Greenstein 1996and 2000, Cunningham 2008, and Baxter and Hewitt 2013 for evidence regarding attitudes). These complications mean that a clean identification of the 'spousal power effect' on the intra-household division of unpaid labor using cross-sectional data has been elusive.…”
Section: In Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the one study that incorporates individual-specific preferences in an analysis of couples' housework time, the evidence suggests that men's preferences matter more than women's [13]. The more men reported enjoying housework tasks, the more time they spent and the less time their partner spent on housework.…”
Section: Preferences and Time Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work of the author contains a larger number of background references for the material presented here and has been used intensively in all major parts of this article [3], [5], [11], [13].…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gupta, 2006Gupta, , 2007Stratton, 2012), whereby the partner's absolute income is the main determinant of time allocated to housework. Apart from these two resource-based explanations, another line of theory has suggested that women might over proportionally contribute to housework to affirm traditional gender roles, a behavior that sociologists term as doing gender (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stratton (2012) suggests that both factors play a role but concentrates on spousal opportunity cost in time. This is also the emphasis of empirical research on time availability, which has focused on the effects of employment status and working hours on the division of housework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%