2015
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2015.1054331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of private speech in cognitive regulation of learners: The case of English as a foreign language education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall the current study showed the emergence of private speech produced by EFL learners while attempting to perform the task alone, thus it can be concluded that private speech can act like a mediating tool in cognitive regulation of learners while doing the tasks in L2. This is in line with findings of many previous studies such as Gheisari( 2017 ), Anani Sarab and Gordani ( 2014 ), Rahimi and Tahmasbi ( 2010 ), Ebadi ( 2014 ) , Khorshidi and Abdikhah ( 2013 ), Lantolf and Frawley ( 1985 ), Storch and Aldosari ( 2010 ), Ohta ( 2001 ) and Berducci ( 2004 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Overall the current study showed the emergence of private speech produced by EFL learners while attempting to perform the task alone, thus it can be concluded that private speech can act like a mediating tool in cognitive regulation of learners while doing the tasks in L2. This is in line with findings of many previous studies such as Gheisari( 2017 ), Anani Sarab and Gordani ( 2014 ), Rahimi and Tahmasbi ( 2010 ), Ebadi ( 2014 ) , Khorshidi and Abdikhah ( 2013 ), Lantolf and Frawley ( 1985 ), Storch and Aldosari ( 2010 ), Ohta ( 2001 ) and Berducci ( 2004 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They were found to help learners control frustration and anxiety and help attention focusing (Centeno-Cortes & Jimenez, 2004 ; DiCamilla & Anton, 2004 ). According to Anani Sarab and Gordani ( 2014 ) using fillers can give learners some time in order to think about the next action to do. The recurring affective markers/fillers in this study were: “ cool ”, “ oh ”, “ aww/oww ”, “ oh my God ”, “ yeah ”, “ wow ”, “ hmmm ” and “ uh huh ” .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, Frawley (1997) claims that by using repetition, speakers help themselves to concentrate on the problem. Also, Anani and Gordani (2014) contend that "repetition mainly signals the participants' ongoing thought process and is an attempt to take it under control". In fact, "the purpose here is to focus and direct the thought towards the item" (p. 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%