2014
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Production in Infant Word Learning

Abstract: Studies of phonological development that combine speech‐processing experiments with observation and analysis of production remain rare, although production experience is necessarily relevant to developmental advance. Here we focus on three proposals regarding the relationship of production to word learning: (1) Articulatory filter: The hypothesis that children are influenced in noticing words in input speech by their resemblance to patterns they can produce has recently received experimental support. (2) Syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(94 reference statements)
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both in infancy and beyond, studies have shown that word production and use provide a more stable, more reliable, better‐established representation than word recognition or comprehension alone (Icht & Mama, ; MacLeod, Gopie, Hourihan, Neary, & Ozubko, ; Vihman, DePaolis, & Keren‐Portnoy, ; Zamuner, Morin‐Lessard, Strahm, & Page, ). There are many reasons why this should be true, including the greater effort involved in production, which accordingly supports more robust memory or representation (Elbers & Wijnen, ) and the support that a match to a well‐practised production routine affords to the challenge of retaining novel word forms; the matching process, which becomes increasingly accessible as the lexicon grows, constructs or shapes phonological memory (Keren‐Portnoy, Vihman, DePaolis, Whitaker, & Williams, ).…”
Section: Word Production I: Item Learning and ‘Pre‐selection’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both in infancy and beyond, studies have shown that word production and use provide a more stable, more reliable, better‐established representation than word recognition or comprehension alone (Icht & Mama, ; MacLeod, Gopie, Hourihan, Neary, & Ozubko, ; Vihman, DePaolis, & Keren‐Portnoy, ; Zamuner, Morin‐Lessard, Strahm, & Page, ). There are many reasons why this should be true, including the greater effort involved in production, which accordingly supports more robust memory or representation (Elbers & Wijnen, ) and the support that a match to a well‐practised production routine affords to the challenge of retaining novel word forms; the matching process, which becomes increasingly accessible as the lexicon grows, constructs or shapes phonological memory (Keren‐Portnoy, Vihman, DePaolis, Whitaker, & Williams, ).…”
Section: Word Production I: Item Learning and ‘Pre‐selection’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of speech gains, instead of waiting for collateral gains, some participants may benefit from directly teaching speech sounds that comprise targeted vocabulary within a multimodal approach. Speech gains are likely to come more slowly than AAC gains, but practicing the motor movements required for speech-sound productions may improve speech learning while also reinforcing word learning (Vihman, DePaolis, & Keren-Portnoy, 2014). …”
Section: The Need For a Multimodal Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the sounds produced in this age are, generally, nasals and stops, both are easy to acquire. There are also evidences that children in the beginning of phonological acquisition select the words to speak at least partially on the basis of how pronounceable they are (28) . The fricatives presented the most significant correlations, whether they are positive or negative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The child presents a good vocabulary and some acquired sounds, so he/she starts to generalize the patterns he/she uses most, adapting fewer accessible target words, syllabic structures or sounds to one or more emergent templates (28) . The U-shaped curve also explains the absence of negative correlations at the age of five years (28) , because after this unstable period, both vocabulary and phonology improve, so both domains become stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%