2017
DOI: 10.1177/0267658316687356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of prosodic structure in the L2 acquisition of Spanish stop lenition

Abstract: This study tests the hypothesis that late first-language English / second-language Spanish learners (L1 English / L2 Spanish learners) acquire spirantization in stages according to the prosodic hierarchy (Zampini, 1997, 1998). In Spanish, voiced stops [b d g] surface after a pause or nasal stop, and continuants [β̞ ð̞ ɣ̞] surface postvocalically, among other contexts. We adopt an Optimality Theoretic analysis of the phenomenon that assumes that postvocalic continuants surface due to the ranking of prosodic pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to English, this lenition rule is a fully conventionalized process systematically found in all speech styles in Spanish, including careful reading style (Hualde et al, 2011). Recent L2 research has investigated the ability of English speakers to produce the voiced approximants focusing on the acoustic realization of late L2 Spanish learners with different levels of instruction (Alvord & Christiansen, 2012; Cabrelli Amaro, 2017; Face & Menke, 2009; Rogers & Alvord, 2014; Shea & Curtin, 2010; Zampini, 1994) and Spanish heritage speakers (Rao, 2014, 2015). However, we still do not know if there are differences between early sequential and simultaneous bilinguals with respect to their acoustic realization of language-specific phonological processes in the heritage language, such as the distribution of voiced stops and spirants in Spanish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to English, this lenition rule is a fully conventionalized process systematically found in all speech styles in Spanish, including careful reading style (Hualde et al, 2011). Recent L2 research has investigated the ability of English speakers to produce the voiced approximants focusing on the acoustic realization of late L2 Spanish learners with different levels of instruction (Alvord & Christiansen, 2012; Cabrelli Amaro, 2017; Face & Menke, 2009; Rogers & Alvord, 2014; Shea & Curtin, 2010; Zampini, 1994) and Spanish heritage speakers (Rao, 2014, 2015). However, we still do not know if there are differences between early sequential and simultaneous bilinguals with respect to their acoustic realization of language-specific phonological processes in the heritage language, such as the distribution of voiced stops and spirants in Spanish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of second language acquisition (SLA) looks to probe the properties of the grammars of second language (L2) learners. While there is much research that investigates a single module such as phonology (Archibald, 1998; Cabrelli Amaro, 2017) or syntax (White, 2003), there has also been much written on the grammatical interfaces (Goad and White, 2004; Montrul, 2011; Sorace, 2011; White, 2011). Considerable attention has been given to the morphology/syntax interface (Franceschina, 2001), and also to the syntax–pragmatics interface (Sorace and Filiaci, 2006), but there has been less attention given to the phonology–syntax interface (see Fodor, 2002) in SLA, though, of course, it has been addressed in the theoretical literature (Elfner, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%