2010
DOI: 10.1080/01690960903525481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of prosody in the English dative alternation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Like Anttila et al (2010), the present study supports the view that in problems that involve the interaction between phonology and syntax, phonological constraints play a major role. The present study also raises some new questions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Like Anttila et al (2010), the present study supports the view that in problems that involve the interaction between phonology and syntax, phonological constraints play a major role. The present study also raises some new questions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the analysis is also fairly simple. In contrast, the data on heavy-NP shift are more variable and the analysis by Anttila et al (2010) uses more intricate constraints. For example, *TERNARY prohibits a prosodic phrase from containing three units, where each unit can be a foot or a syntactic phrase; *P-PHRASE requires there to be as few prosodic phrases as possible; and *to prohibits the use of prepositions.…”
Section: Interactions Among Syntax Semantics and Phonologymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 1 See, among many others, Zec and Inkelas 1990, Halpern 1995, Adger 1997, 2007a,b, Zubizarreta 1998, Chung 2003, Culicover and Jackendoff 2005, Gutiérrez-Bravo 2005, Vicente 2005, Göbbel 2007, Anttila 2008, Kandybowicz 2009, López 2009, Agbayani, Golston, and Henderer 2010, Anttila, Adams, and Speriosu 2010, Richards 2010, Manetta 2012, Sabbagh 2013 Here and below, we occasionally highlight the position of a postposed pronoun by placing it in a box; we also indicate the syntactically expected position of the pronoun by way of the symbol .…”
Section: Initial Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the linguistics context, the phenomenon has been dubbed the "iambic-trochaic law" (Hayes 1985(Hayes , 1995Hay and Diehl 2007), where the long-last preference applies at the level of the phonological foot. On the syntactic side, long-last effects have been thoroughly explored under the name of "Heavy NP shift" in English and other languages (Wasow 1997a, b;Wasow and Arnold 2003;Wasow 2002;Anttila et al 2010). A variety of syntactic constructions cater to Pāṇini's principle, such as the dative construction in English (3), where the acceptability of ordering the theme NP after the goal PP increases as the theme NP becomes larger.…”
Section: Long-last In Languagementioning
confidence: 99%