The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments

Abstract

Background. The use of qualitative research (QR) methods is recommended as good practice in discrete choice experiments (DCEs). This study investigated the use and reporting of QR to inform the design and/or interpretation of healthcare-related DCEs and explored the perceived usefulness of such methods. Methods. DCEs were identified from a systematic search of the MEDLINE database. Studies were classified by the quantity of QR reported (none, basic, or extensive). Authors (n = 91) of papers reporting the use of QR were invited to complete an online survey eliciting their views about using the methods. Results. A total of 254 healthcare DCEs were included in the review; of these, 111 (44%) did not report using any qualitative methods; 114 (45%) reported “basic” information; and 29 (11%) reported or cited “extensive” use of qualitative methods. Studies reporting the use of qualitative methods used them to select attributes and/or levels (n = 95; 66%) and/or pilot the DCE survey (n = 26; 18%). Popular qualitative methods included focus groups (n = 63; 44%) and interviews (n = 109; 76%). Forty-four studies (31%) reported the analytical approach, with content (n = 10; 7%) and framework analysis (n = 5; 4%) most commonly reported. The survey identified that all responding authors (n = 50; 100%) found that qualitative methods added value to their DCE study, but many (n = 22; 44%) reported that journals were uninterested in the reporting of QR results. Conclusions. Despite recommendations that QR methods be used alongside DCEs, the use of QR methods is not consistently reported. The lack of reporting risks the inference that QR methods are of little use in DCE research, contradicting practitioners’ assessments. Explicit guidelines would enable more clarity and consistency in reporting, and journals should facilitate such reporting via online supplementary materials.

Today's doctors: What do men and women value in a training post?

“…Respondents were then asked to choose, which of the two positions on offer they would prefer (ie, will provide them with more utility), based upon the levels of attributes that make up each competing hypothetical scenario. The choice of job attributes and levels included within the DCE were developed through a rigorous process and according to best practice in DCE design, including a literature search 48,49 and qualitative work 50,51 to ensure the content was meaningful to the target group (see Table 1).…”

Adolescent and parent perspectives on the acceptability of financial incentives to promote self‐care in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

“…A qualitative study using focus groups (FG) with adolescents with T1D and parents of adolescents with T1D was conducted in 2018. The qualitative study is part of a larger project to develop and execute a discrete choice experiment to systematically assess patient preferences for FIs to promote improvement in adolescents' diabetes self‐care . This report conforms to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research …”

Service Preferences of Parents of Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Conjoint Analysis Study

“…However, eliciting patient preferences for the various characteristics of health care services is not straightforward. One technique for quantifying preferences that has gained traction in investigating health care questions is discrete-choice experimentation or conjoint analysis (CA) (Reed Johnson et al 2013;Kleij et al 2017;Vass et al 2017). The CA approach, originally developed for consumer studies in marketing, is a survey method encompassing data collection and analysis.…”