The Role of Race, Ethnicity, and Party on Attitudes Toward Descriptive Representation

Abstract

Using original survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey (CCES), we examine variation in racial and ethnic group and partisan attitudes toward legislators and representation. Respondents were asked about their views on descriptive representation, its importance for their own elected official, and whether it was important to have more descriptive representatives in general. Using respondents’ personal characteristics such as education, partisanship, race, ethnicity, income, and race and ethnicity of their House of Representatives member, we analyze the impact of these variables on attitudes toward representation. We find that Latino and Black respondents place a high level of importance on having descriptive representatives in their own districts in addition to articulating a high degree of importance to having more representatives from their respective group. However, Latino Republicans place less importance on descriptive representation overall than Latino non-Republican respondents. Non-Latino Republicans also place importance on more legislators of their same race or ethnicity. The findings have implications for democratic governance as the demographics of the United States rapidly changes.

Do Latinos still support immigrant rights activism? Examining Latino attitudes a decade after the 2006 protest wave

“…However, it is possible that Latino Republicans may have felt differently on immigration because of the personal nature of the issue for the Latino community. The role of partisanship amongst Latinos has consistently explained Latino political attitudes with Republicans demonstrating different policy positions and attitudes than their Democratic counterparts (Abrajano and Alvarez 2010;Casellas and Wallace 2015).…”

Does descriptive representation lead to social desirability bias? Over-reporting of voting among blacks and Latinos in the United States

“…Moreover, Casellas and Wallace (2015) show that both Latinos and blacks have strong preferences for more descriptive representation in Congress. The elevated social pressure to turnout to increase diversity in government may lead blacks and Latinos who have the potential to be descriptively represented to feel ashamed for staying home on Election Day.…”

Latino Attitudes About Surrogate Representation in the United States*

“…This finding suggests that the notion of surrogate representation is meaningful to people and they respond positively to the idea that their group has a voice in the legislature, regardless of whether that voice comes from their own district. More recently, Casellas and Wallace () found that Latinos and blacks were more likely than whites to say that having more co‐ethnic representatives in Congress is important. Their study, however, was unable to assess the mechanisms underlying the ethnic group differences.…”

“…The second is partisan identification. As most Latino elected officials are Democrats, perhaps Latinos who are Republican do not feel that Latinos in Congress represent them (Casellas and Wallace, ). Next is a dummy variable that indicates if the respondent and his or her representative are from the same political party, since it is plausible that people whose representatives are from a different party might be especially likely to feel like they need to look elsewhere for representation.…”