2012
DOI: 10.1127/1868-5749/2011/0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of reference conditions in water quality assessment: application of a fuzzy logic-based Decision Support System (DSS) in the Danube and Elbe River Basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Threshold refinement: Some thresholds (namely, the thresholds for the indicator "fish species richness") were refined according to expert opinion in the IRA application, which could be further improved when more historical or field data are available. A rigorous and transparent process has always to be followed in setting reference conditions or target values because, as previously discussed in Semenzin et al (2012), this is a sensitive step in the integrated risk assessment process that could lead to significantly different results irrespective of the algorithms included in the adopted methodologies; 3. The methodologies used for the integration of data from different domains: The IRA implements three hierarchical aggregation steps based on fuzzy inference system for the LoE biology (predominant LoE), and it applies t h e O O A O p r i n c i p l e f o r p h y s i c o -c h e m i s t r y, hydromorphology and chemistry (supportive LoE); these approaches lead to more stricter results with respect to the RHA methodology proposed by Leigh et al (2012) ( Table 3).…”
Section: Comparison Of Results Between Ira and Rha Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Threshold refinement: Some thresholds (namely, the thresholds for the indicator "fish species richness") were refined according to expert opinion in the IRA application, which could be further improved when more historical or field data are available. A rigorous and transparent process has always to be followed in setting reference conditions or target values because, as previously discussed in Semenzin et al (2012), this is a sensitive step in the integrated risk assessment process that could lead to significantly different results irrespective of the algorithms included in the adopted methodologies; 3. The methodologies used for the integration of data from different domains: The IRA implements three hierarchical aggregation steps based on fuzzy inference system for the LoE biology (predominant LoE), and it applies t h e O O A O p r i n c i p l e f o r p h y s i c o -c h e m i s t r y, hydromorphology and chemistry (supportive LoE); these approaches lead to more stricter results with respect to the RHA methodology proposed by Leigh et al (2012) ( Table 3).…”
Section: Comparison Of Results Between Ira and Rha Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographical reference sites (i.e. specific locations on a water body that is minimally impaired and is representative of the expected ecological integrity) can constitute the best choice for deriving reference conditions (Semenzin et al 2012). When such sites do not exist for the river basin of interest, alternatives for setting the reference conditions can include historical or modelled data, established criteria or standards, expert opinion or local knowledge (Leigh et al 2012).…”
Section: Integrated Risk Assessment Methodology and Selected Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aimed at overcoming such limitations, DSSs are computer software programs that use models, data and other related information to make site-specific recommendations with various purposes. Recent examples in the farming sector include the management of agricultural pesticides ( Beck et al, 1989 ), farm financial planning ( Boggess et al, 1989 , Herrero et al, 1996 ), livestock enterprises ( Stuth and Lyons, 1993 ), and land and crop nutrient planning ( Basso et al, 2013 , Quemada and Cabrera, 1995 , Li et al, 2009 ), and river basin management Semenzin et al (2012) . DSSs have mainly been designed to support farm advisors and other involved technicians in their interaction with policy makers and farmers ( Nelson et al, 2002 ), although some systems allow direct use by the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%