The Role of Relational Familiarity When Interpreting Family Business Communication

Abstract

Research problem: This study investigates the difference in perceptions within the family-owned businesses of messages received from family members and outsiders to assess the role that relational familiarity (the amount of prior experience two people share communicating with each other) plays in internal business communication in these settings. Previous research has shown that this relational familiarity-along with experience with the communicative medium, the message topic, and the business context-lead to channel expansion (the ability to reduce uncertainty from a message with limited communicative cues) for business communicators. But the impact of relational familiarity on communication competence and personal biases between family members-which could impact the ability of relational familiarity to achieve its intended goals-has yet to be fully explored. Research questions: (1) Does increased relational familiarity between communicators lead to increased perceptions of message effectiveness and appropriateness in lean media settings? (2) In family business settings where familial biases may be prevalent, is increased relational familiarity linked to perceptions of increased sender likeability and lowered message negativity? Literature review: Channel Expansion Theory, which proposes that communicators can overcome the limitations of a medium by using their personal experience, guides this study. Previous research found that with personal experience with the communicator sending the message, a message receiver can enhance the limited capacity of a medium to convey cues that aid in understanding the message. Four perceptual variables-message effectiveness, message appropriateness, message negativity, sender likeability-result in benefits accrued from channel expansion and relational familiarity, such as reduced uncertainty and equivocality about the message topic. Methodology: A quasiexperimental setting was designed to elicit messages from business co-workers using email. Message senders were instructed to describe the same business problem in order for the recipient to understand the problem and decide how to proceed. Eighty-three family business owners, managers, and employees received one message from a family member belonging to the same business and one message assigned at random from a nonfamily member working elsewhere (a stranger). The 83 message receivers were asked to complete instruments measuring their perceptions of the messages. Results and conclusions: Results suggested that the relational familiarity between communicators played a significant role in improving message effectiveness and message appropriateness. Sender likeability was also enhanced when family members correctly identified the source of the message. The findings suggest that family members can benefit from channel expansion, though not as many members as expected, and that complex problem and task descriptions were communicated using lean media (communication channels that inhibit sending messages infused with communicative cues...

How Familial Is Family Social Capital? Analyzing Bonding Social Capital in Family and Nonfamily Firms

“…However, as explained before, there is a negative side to very intense family relationships and this strong system of meanings, which might explain why we found that NF-FF did not have an impact on performance. This idiosyncratic communication can disadvantage nonfamily members (Marett, Marett, & Litchfield, 2015).…”

Nonfamily Members in Family Firms: A Review and Future Research Agenda

“…Likewise, Morris et al (2010) find that nonfamily members often struggle in family firms because of the ambiguity inherent in these smaller, more entrepreneurial firms. Research also suggests the relational familiarity between family members leads to idiosyncratic communication styles that can put nonfamily members at a disadvantage (Marett et al, 2015). Although less common than generally assumed, family conflict can also create additional challenges in recruiting, assimilating, and retaining nonfamily members (Beehr et al, 1997).…”

Socioemotional wealth importance within family firm internal communication

“…Student participants were instructed to write an e-mail message informing their family co-worker about a business disruption stemming from accidentally infecting a business computer with malware and admitting their culpability. We chose this scenario as it is salient to firms in virtually every field and has been utilized in previous research on business communication (Marett et al, 2015). Using a scenario involving an unplanned business disruption also provides a glimpse into the relationship-stabilizing and reputation-restoration efforts of firm leaders, both common themes found in communication put forth by leaders during the times of crisis (Tucker and Melewar, 2005;Coombs and Holladay, 2001).…”