2004
DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.68.3.21.34765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Relational Knowledge Stores in Interfirm Partnering

Abstract: Drawing on the notions of relational capabilities and absorptive capacity, the authors examine the effects of interactional, functional, and environmental knowledge stores on relationship quality and relationship portfolio effectiveness. The results suggest that the knowledge stores affect the outcome variables differently and that the effects vary by levels of industry turbulence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
243
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
3
243
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only recently have researchers begun to examine the role of sensemaking in new product (Akgun, Lynn, & Yilmaz, 2006) and interfirm outcomes (Johnson, Sohi, & Grewal, 2004). Beyond these few exceptions, research has focused on sensemaking in organizations rather than organizational sensemaking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently have researchers begun to examine the role of sensemaking in new product (Akgun, Lynn, & Yilmaz, 2006) and interfirm outcomes (Johnson, Sohi, & Grewal, 2004). Beyond these few exceptions, research has focused on sensemaking in organizations rather than organizational sensemaking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building from extant literature (e.g., [24,47]), we argue that firmlevel relational strategies are important, unexplored drivers of IFR development. We draw on interfirm relational theory (e.g., [9,65]) to propose relational proclivity (willingness to engage in IFRs) and relational capability (ability to make and manage strong IFRs) as components of a firm's relational strategy that influence IFR development, in terms of information flows and relational embeddedness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A firm with greater relational capability possesses the ability to maneuver the quagmire of potential IFRs successfully and select a network of partners to facilitate its strategic objectives [32,39]. Relational capability derives from the stores of knowledge that the firm accumulates as it engages in IFRs (e.g., [47,57]). …”
Section: Relational Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Heide & Wathne (2006) argue that in long-term relationships with high social content, the parties adopt systematic cooperation. Obadia (2008) defines commitment expectations as the belief of the parties that the relationship is stable and safe (Johnson et al, 2004). As mentioned by Obadia (2008), trust enables companies to have access to crucial information needed to cooperate.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Cooperation and Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%