2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct to ACLS in non-traumatic cardiac arrest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5 Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta represents a new tool that can be used as an alternative to performing resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) in traumatic arrest 6 ; as an adjunct for intra-abdominal, pelvic, or junctional hemorrhage 7 ; or as a method of promoting central perfusion in cases of circulatory collapse from non-hemorrhagic shock. 8 The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Aortic Occlusion in Resuscitation for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) multi-institutional database was created in 2013 as a means to capture contemporary methods of AO with the purpose of refining clinical protocols and future data collection. The results from this database demonstrated no difference in survival between REBOA and RT; however, the study included all patients who received REBOA with significantly varied causes of hemorrhage and physiologic status at the time of intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta represents a new tool that can be used as an alternative to performing resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) in traumatic arrest 6 ; as an adjunct for intra-abdominal, pelvic, or junctional hemorrhage 7 ; or as a method of promoting central perfusion in cases of circulatory collapse from non-hemorrhagic shock. 8 The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Aortic Occlusion in Resuscitation for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) multi-institutional database was created in 2013 as a means to capture contemporary methods of AO with the purpose of refining clinical protocols and future data collection. The results from this database demonstrated no difference in survival between REBOA and RT; however, the study included all patients who received REBOA with significantly varied causes of hemorrhage and physiologic status at the time of intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the NDT group were hypotensive from neurogenic shock, and one patient was hypotensive from a suspected blunt cardiac injury. While most of the evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of REBOA is in hemorrhagic models, some studies suggest a benefit from increased coronary and cerebral perfusion in non-traumatic models [4]. This suggests that both neurogenic and blunt cardiogenic shock could potentially benefit from REBOA, and there is a lack of evidence to suggest REBOA would be unsafe in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible control of bleeding and the hemodynamic effect of REBOA with improvement in coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure may have a positive survival benefit (9,10). On the other hand, REBOA serves as a bridge to definitive surgical bleeding control and treatment, and is therefore a procedure used to gain time and not for definitive care (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%