2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of safety-seeking behaviours in maintaining threat appraisals in psychosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, research has shown that health behaviours prevent proper fear extinction and this effect may be accounted for by high-level cognitive processes such as attention and reasoning (Lovibond, Mitchell, Minard, Brady, & Menzies, 2009). Consistent with this view, previous research has shown that engagement in safety behaviours results in an increase in threat appraisal which then leads to an increase in distress (Gaynor, Ward, Garety, & Peters, 2013). Previous research has also shown that engagement in safety behaviours results in the maintenance of negative judgments about anxiety (Taylor & Alden, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, research has shown that health behaviours prevent proper fear extinction and this effect may be accounted for by high-level cognitive processes such as attention and reasoning (Lovibond, Mitchell, Minard, Brady, & Menzies, 2009). Consistent with this view, previous research has shown that engagement in safety behaviours results in an increase in threat appraisal which then leads to an increase in distress (Gaynor, Ward, Garety, & Peters, 2013). Previous research has also shown that engagement in safety behaviours results in the maintenance of negative judgments about anxiety (Taylor & Alden, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Individuals without a need for care report higher perceived control over their voices than do people with a need for care. 22 They also display less symptomatic coping 61 (ie, going along with the content of voices), engage in fewer safety behaviors in relation to their anomalous experiences, 62 and score lower on maladaptive response styles in response to experimentally induced anomalous experiences. 63 Voice hearers with a need for care are more likely to attribute their voices to real people or agencies, as opposed to spiritual or religious sources, 19 and generally have more “paranoid” appraisals both of their own experiences 64,65 and of experimentally induced anomalous experiences.…”
Section: What Are the Similarities And Differences In The Avh Reportementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that have used the SBQ as well as other interview methodology have reported that the majority of participants use safety‐seeking behaviours. The totals reported range from 82% of participants (Gaynor, Ward, Garety, & Peters, ) to 100% (Freeman et al, ; Nothard et al, ) and include samples of participants with persecutory delusions (Freeman et al, ), auditory (Hacker et al, ), and visual hallucinations (Dudley et al, ). It has been consistently reported that avoidance is the most commonly used strategy followed by in‐situation safety behaviours (Chaix et al, ; Freeman et al, ; Freeman et al, ; Hacker et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%