The extravascular penetration and bactericidal activity of aztreonam, cefuroxime, and ampicillin against ,-lactamase-positive and -negative Haemophilus influenzae strains were compared in a rabbit model. All groups of animals received an identical total dose of 100 mg of either antibiotic per kg given by four different intravenous modes of administration including a single large injectiorl, four intermittent injections, a continuous infusion, and an injection followed by an infusion. Aztreonam had a higher degree of penetration in interstitial fluid and fibrin clots and was the most effective agent against 13-lactamase-positive and -negative H. influenzae. A single large injection of either drug resulted in sigitificantly higher peak levels and higher initial area under the curves of concentrations of drugs in serum, the interstitial fluid, and fibrin clots than those by other modes of administration. Continuous infusions of antibiotics resulted in poor in vivo bactericidal activity. Other modes of administration exhibited good antibacterial activity within the first 6 h of the study.Thereafter, a single large injection of aztreonam resulted in a much more rapid killing of H. influenzae than that by injection of the other drugs. Aztreonam and cefuroxime showed good in vivo stability to ,3-lactamase produced by H. influenzae while ampicillin was rapidly hydrolyzed in vivo.The influence of the mode of administration on the penetration and efficacy of antimicrobial agents is still a matter of controversy (2,4,20,33). Some investigators have suggested that the most effective mode of treatment should provide tissue concentrations of antibiotic continuously in excess of the minimal concentration inhibiting the pathogen (13, 23). Continuously maintained bactericidal levels are particularly important to effect cure in cases of invasive infections such as bacterial endocarditis (35), meningitis (24), or infections in neutropenic or cancer patients (8,9,14,37), in whom host defenses may be impaired. Other investigators have demonstrated that these constant bactericidal levels of drug may not be necessary (7,28,29) and that frequent administration of antibiotics at short intervals is as effective as constant infusion, since it results in significant accumulation of drugs in interstitial fluid (17) and tissues (1, 4). Any mode of administration producing higher penetration into extravascular sites may be clinically advantageous, since most infections, including those caused by Haemophilus influenzae, occur outside the bloodstream. It is likewise difficult to define the influence of the concentration obtained in the extravascular compartment on the bactericidal activity of antibiotics since most investigators have only evaluated the pharmacology of antibiotics (2, 11, 33), or have studied the bacteriological outcome of therapy (9, 14, 23), without specifically analyzing tissue penetration of drugs and the kinetics of bacterial killing at the site of infection.In an effort to clarify these issues, we compared simultaneously t...