2010
DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2010.513179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of school leadership in the implementation of the Transition Year Programme in Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…of Education, 1993), somewhat tangential to the main rationale for the programme-that is, supporting students' personal development-it is clear that research findings of superior Leaving Certificate performance among participants do go some way to allaying concerns that participation in the year out from examination-based education might have a negative impact on students' achievement. However, this awareness can contribute to a rather conservative approach to designing the content of the programme, with the distinction between the Transition Year and the two years of the Leaving Certificate proper becoming somewhat blurred in some schools (Jeffers, 2010). This pragmatic approach by school staff can be seen as reflecting the systemic dominance of the instrumentalist pressures associated with high-stakes testing in Ireland-although it is recognised that such pressure on educators is not unique to the Irish context (see, for example, Amrein-Beardsley, Berliner and Rideau (2010) for further discussion of such pressures).…”
Section: Looking Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…of Education, 1993), somewhat tangential to the main rationale for the programme-that is, supporting students' personal development-it is clear that research findings of superior Leaving Certificate performance among participants do go some way to allaying concerns that participation in the year out from examination-based education might have a negative impact on students' achievement. However, this awareness can contribute to a rather conservative approach to designing the content of the programme, with the distinction between the Transition Year and the two years of the Leaving Certificate proper becoming somewhat blurred in some schools (Jeffers, 2010). This pragmatic approach by school staff can be seen as reflecting the systemic dominance of the instrumentalist pressures associated with high-stakes testing in Ireland-although it is recognised that such pressure on educators is not unique to the Irish context (see, for example, Amrein-Beardsley, Berliner and Rideau (2010) for further discussion of such pressures).…”
Section: Looking Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second major source of information comes from the work of Jeffers (2007Jeffers ( , 2010Jeffers ( , 2011, who reports observations from six case study schools with "distinctive good practice in their TY programmes" (2007, p. 31). The findings-of students', teachers', and parents' attitudes to the programme and schools' organisation and implementation of the programmeare based on detailed interviews with school principals and Transition Year co-ordinators, focus groups with students and parents, and questionnaire data returned from more than 100 teachers across the six selected schools.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations