The role of scientific terminology in research and teaching: Is something important missing?

Abstract

The recent discussion between Lewis and

Can Definitions Contribute to Alternative Conceptions?: A Meta-Study Approach

“…This definition of alternative conception is slightly modified from Redish' s (2004) definition of misconception because different communities in Science, such as Biology, Chemistry and Physics, may have different accepted scientific knowledge and definitions. In addition, it is common within physics community to have different preference on the definitions of physical concepts (Slisko & Dykstra, 1997;Swendsen, 2011). There can be advantages for alternative conception to be broadly defined, to include all kinds of 'misconceptions'during the learning process.…”

“…Since memorization of the definition of a concept is relatively easier than understanding of its physical meaning; many students may prefer this way of learning for assessment. Hence, "learning of a concept"and "learning of a definition of a concept"are not necessarily the same thing (Smith & Ragan, 1999). Teachers should be aware that textbook authors may adopt definitions which have varied precisions.…”

“…The issues on definitions may not be easily resolved as there are disagreements on many definitions, such as heat (Slisko & Dykstra, 1997). Zemansky (1970) preferred to define heat as a noun, that is, heat is the 'energy' transferred because of temperature difference.…”

On Discerning Critical Elements, Relationships and Shifts in Attaining Scientific Terms: The Challenge of Polysemy/Homonymy and Reference

“…However, the existence of a precise scientific terminology have been discussed e.g. by Slisko and Dykstra (1997), who describe a confusing use of terms like heat, work, specific heat, heat capacity and thermal conductivity in text-books. Their recommendation, in polemics with Pushkin (1996Pushkin ( , 1997, is conceptual multiplicity and diversity since there is no common scientific consensus among scientists, textbook authors and educators.…”

Ground Support Terminology and Classification: An Update

“…For clear communication, one should avoid the use of different terms for one thing and the use of a single term for different things (e.g., Slisko and Dykstra 1997). In an attempt to rationalise ground support product descriptions Thompson and Windsor (1992); Windsor and Thompson (1993) first proposed a new terminology and a classification scheme for reinforcement systems.…”