1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62250-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Second-Order Probabilities in Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence suggesting that decision makers tend to choose ambiguous options more frequently under such conditions (Cohen, Jaffray, & Said, 1985;Goldsmith & Sahlin, 1983). If loss aversion is a key factor driving repetition effects, then these effects should be sharpened in mixed gambles, because real losses should have stronger psychological effects than mere opportunity costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence suggesting that decision makers tend to choose ambiguous options more frequently under such conditions (Cohen, Jaffray, & Said, 1985;Goldsmith & Sahlin, 1983). If loss aversion is a key factor driving repetition effects, then these effects should be sharpened in mixed gambles, because real losses should have stronger psychological effects than mere opportunity costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About two-thirds of the subjects preferred the less ambiguous distribution in a pair, roughly independently of E(p). Goldsmith and Sahlin (1983) report a study using bets on natural events, like the occurrence of a bus strike in Verona next week. Holding first-order (or mean) probability constant, about half the subjects preferred bets on less ambiguous events for gains and bets on more ambiguous events for losses.…”
Section: Ellsbeig Experiments and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Авторы выделяют две модели процесса принятия решения: 1) «модель познавательного риска», подразу-мевающая оценку ситуации с точки зрения определенности-неопределенности и принятие решение о возможном изменении ситуации неопределенности; в данном случае человек достигает удовлетворительного уровня неопределенности; 2) «мо-дель полезности выигрыша и проигрыша», предполагает, что человек делает все, для достижения возможной и необходимой для себя определенности (Goldsmith & Sahlin, 1983).…”
Section: образование и саморазвитие том 12 № 2 2017unclassified