2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021gl096266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Sediment Accretion and Buoyancy on Subduction Dynamics and Geometry

Abstract: The main parameters controlling subduction kinematics and geometry remain poorly understood. Previous work suggested that plate motion depends on the balance between the negative buoyancy of the subducting lithosphere (e.g.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, forearc compression may lead to uplift through thrust faulting and accretion and/or forearc underplating (Clift & Hartley 2007;Menant et al 2020). Depending on material buoyancy, accreting/underplating may also serve to counteract the slab pull force (Keum & So 2021;Brizzi et al 2021). On the other hand, lower shear stresses associated with the weak interface case could lead to normal faulting and potentially decreased topography and local forearc submergence (e.g.…”
Section: Relationships Between Interface Rheology and Forearc Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, forearc compression may lead to uplift through thrust faulting and accretion and/or forearc underplating (Clift & Hartley 2007;Menant et al 2020). Depending on material buoyancy, accreting/underplating may also serve to counteract the slab pull force (Keum & So 2021;Brizzi et al 2021). On the other hand, lower shear stresses associated with the weak interface case could lead to normal faulting and potentially decreased topography and local forearc submergence (e.g.…”
Section: Relationships Between Interface Rheology and Forearc Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%