2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10882-014-9388-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Self-Beliefs in Predicting Postschool Outcomes for Deaf Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Shogren and Shaw (2016a, 2016b) only looked at the impact of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment on Wave 5 NLTS2 outcome data. Others restricted their sample to focus on specific subpopulations (e.g., those receiving Social Security benefits or who are deaf or hard of hearing; Berry et al, 2012; Garberoglio, Schoffstall, Cawthon, Bond, & Ge, 2014). The purpose of this article, therefore, was to address this gap in the literature and examine the degree to which autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment (measured while youth were in secondary school) predicted postschool outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shogren and Shaw (2016a, 2016b) only looked at the impact of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment on Wave 5 NLTS2 outcome data. Others restricted their sample to focus on specific subpopulations (e.g., those receiving Social Security benefits or who are deaf or hard of hearing; Berry et al, 2012; Garberoglio, Schoffstall, Cawthon, Bond, & Ge, 2014). The purpose of this article, therefore, was to address this gap in the literature and examine the degree to which autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment (measured while youth were in secondary school) predicted postschool outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has indicated that deaf adolescents' autonomous orientations, and their parents' expectations, are linked to future employment outcomes (Garberoglio et al 2014;Cawthon et al 2015). However, possible mechanisms that explain these relationships are largely unknown, and will be assessed in this study.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Covariates in this analysis have largely been drawn from prior research on factors that affect educational and occupational outcomes for deaf students using the NLTS2 (Cawthon, Garberoglio, Caemmerer, Bond, & Wendel, 2015;Coyle, 2012;Garberoglio, Cawthon, & Bond, 2013;Garberoglio, Schoffstall, Cawthon, Bond, & Ge, 2014;Marschark, Shaver, Nagle, & Newman, 2015;Shaver et al, 2014), as well as for youth with disabilities as a whole (Shogren, 2013;Shogren, Kennedy, Dowsett, & Little, 2014;Shogren, Wehmeyer, Palmer, Rifenbark, & Little, 2015). Covariates in this analysis have largely been drawn from prior research on factors that affect educational and occupational outcomes for deaf students using the NLTS2 (Cawthon, Garberoglio, Caemmerer, Bond, & Wendel, 2015;Coyle, 2012;Garberoglio, Cawthon, & Bond, 2013;Garberoglio, Schoffstall, Cawthon, Bond, & Ge, 2014;Marschark, Shaver, Nagle, & Newman, 2015;Shaver et al, 2014), as well as for youth with disabilities as a whole (Shogren, 2013;Shogren, Kennedy, Dowsett, & Little, 2014;Shogren, Wehmeyer, Palmer, Rifenbark, & Little, 2015).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propensity score covariates. Covariates in this analysis have largely been drawn from prior research on factors that affect educational and occupational outcomes for deaf students using the NLTS2 (Cawthon, Garberoglio, Caemmerer, Bond, & Wendel, 2015;Coyle, 2012;Garberoglio, Cawthon, & Bond, 2013;Garberoglio, Schoffstall, Cawthon, Bond, & Ge, 2014;Marschark, Shaver, Nagle, & Newman, 2015;Shaver et al, 2014), as well as for youth with disabilities as a whole (Shogren, 2013;Shogren, Kennedy, Dowsett, & Little, 2014;Shogren, Wehmeyer, Palmer, Rifenbark, & Little, 2015). More specifically, we co-varied for all of the demographic information provided in Table 1 with the exception of degree of hearing loss (i.e., classifications of mild, moderate, and profound).…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%