The Role of Share Repurchases for Firms’ Social and Environmental Sustainability

Abstract

This article embarks on ethical trade-offs at the sustainability/finance interface by contrasting shareholders’ interest in short-term financial returns with society’s interest in counteracting ecological and social grievances. Scrutinizing share repurchases, we investigate a firm’s communicated sustainability orientation (i.e., its environmental and social value orientation) as well as its environmental and social sustainability performance. Our results are based on a large-scale panel dataset of 491 U.S. firms observed from 2004 to 2016. The dataset combines share buyback data with sustainability orientation scores from shareholder letters and sustainability performance ratings. The econometric models suggest no association between social value orientation and repurchase volumes, but a significantly negative relationship between environmental value orientation and buybacks in a cubic form. Executive stock options partially attenuate this relationship. Share repurchases in turn negatively affect future environmental and social performance. This study grasps the consequences of firms’ short-term shareholder satisfaction and discusses its ethical implications in the context of firms’ contribution to sustainable development, thereby providing important insights to the business ethics discourse.

The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Climate Governance Disclosure

“…This includes but is not limited to developing and adopting an efficient climate governance system. Unlike agency theory, which is concerned with a board's monitoring role, resource dependence theory relates to its advising and unique resource-providing role [61][62][63][64]. A diverse board of directors will typically also have a diverse set of qualifications and skills.…”

The role of CEO regulatory focus in increasing or reducing corporate carbon emissions

“…However, we argue that it is of central importance to look at stakeholders individually without compounding them. By exploring corporate carbon emissions exclusively, we consider the natural environment as a key stakeholder of companies that is directly affected by a firm's carbon footprint (Laine, 2010;Phillips & Reichart, 2000); this builds a bridge to research on corporate sustainability, which has its roots in the triple bottom line approach and which calls for distinguishing how firms contribute to social or environmental issues (Vaupel et al, 2023).…”

The more the better? Service transition for shaping sustainable development in manufacturing firms and the role of top management team attributes

“…We focus on multiple dimensions of SP, the most important of which are the three pillars: environmental, social, and governance. To our knowledge, this is the most recent development in the space of sustainability ratings (Barros et al, 2022;Vaupel et al, 2023). We use the China Securities ESG Rating Index to measure SP.…”