2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1092893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Spatial Proximity in the Adoption of a Digital Product

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we may observe an opportunity for communication between two people and a correlation in their behavior, our ability to infer that person A's behavior had been affected by an interaction with B is not straightforward. What may be perceived as social effect can actually echo similarities in customers' preferences and tastes that reflect their intrinsic tendency to behave similarly, or a common response to a similar external ''shock,'' such as a promotion (Barrot et al 2008;Manski 2000). The solutions to such problems often require rich data and advanced statistical analysis (Hartmann et al 2008).…”
Section: Statistical Models and The Challenges Of C2c Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we may observe an opportunity for communication between two people and a correlation in their behavior, our ability to infer that person A's behavior had been affected by an interaction with B is not straightforward. What may be perceived as social effect can actually echo similarities in customers' preferences and tastes that reflect their intrinsic tendency to behave similarly, or a common response to a similar external ''shock,'' such as a promotion (Barrot et al 2008;Manski 2000). The solutions to such problems often require rich data and advanced statistical analysis (Hartmann et al 2008).…”
Section: Statistical Models and The Challenges Of C2c Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures of social contagion due to geographic proximity are developed on the premise that people who live closer to each other observe and interact with each other and thus, can influence each other's behavior and attitudes. Geographic proximity is the most basic source of homophily that connects people (McPherson, Smith‐Lovin, & Cook, 2001), and the distance between any two people serves as a proxy for both the degree of influence on each other (Strang & Tuma, 1993) and the extent of informational transfer between them (Barrot, Rangaswamy, Albers, & Shaikh, 2008). Geographic proximity is also an important factor that influences the closeness of a relationship between two people as determined by the multiplexity and frequency of contact between them (McPherson et al, 2001).…”
Section: Modeling Geographic Proximity Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If that is the case, as ICTs develop and lower internationalization costs further, we may expect the significance of distancedependent explanations of internationalization to diminish in the future. However, studies in other seemingly ''frictionless'' environments such as equity trading and information system adoption showed the importance of distance (Barrot et al 2008) and the continuing relevance of distance-dependent internationalization models (Beugelsdijk and Frijns 2010). The second goal is, therefore, to determine the applicability of either distance-dependent or distance-invariant explanations of internationalization to a new domain where they have not been explored: SNS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%