2016
DOI: 10.1111/aen.12201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of spiders as predators of two lepidopteran Brassica pests

Abstract: Spiders are thought to play a significant role in limiting pest outbreaks in agroecosystems such as vineyards, orchards and cotton. The diversity and impact of spiders in vegetable crops are less well understood, although there is evidence that predators may be important for suppression of lepidopteran pests in Brassica crops, particularly early in the season before parasitoids become established. Sampling was conducted in early season plantings of Brassicas in the Lockyer Valley (South East Queensland, Austra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the predator-prey models with ratio dependence also demonstrate that the refuge effect supports the coexistence of the predator and prey [35]. Notably, the discrete-time predator-prey system, which is more compatible in describing the dynamics of insects than the continuous system considering the generation nonoverlapping of many insects [3,[24][25][26], also confirms the stabilizing effect of refuge in predator-prey systems [35,36]. However, the spatiotemporal dynamics of discrete insect predator-prey systems with the refuge effect are still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the predator-prey models with ratio dependence also demonstrate that the refuge effect supports the coexistence of the predator and prey [35]. Notably, the discrete-time predator-prey system, which is more compatible in describing the dynamics of insects than the continuous system considering the generation nonoverlapping of many insects [3,[24][25][26], also confirms the stabilizing effect of refuge in predator-prey systems [35,36]. However, the spatiotemporal dynamics of discrete insect predator-prey systems with the refuge effect are still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A series of experiments have shown that predator–prey interactions among insects (e.g., moths and spiders) conform to the Holling type II functional response [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. In most prior studies, the Holling type II predator–prey models were continuous and analyzed by phase plane and bifurcation diagrams, without integrating ecological phenomenon to analyze dynamic behaviors [ 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a community, they employ a diversity of foraging techniques (Turnbull, 1973; Riechert & Lockley, 1984) which influence food webs via a range of hunting strategies including passive sit‐and‐wait predation from webs, and active hunting (Michalko & Pekár, 2016). Acknowledgement that spiders are an effective biocontrol agent has existed for decades (Riechert & Lockley, 1984; Sunderland et al ., 1997; Sunderland, 1999) since they regularly consume pests such as aphids (Sunderland et al ., 1986; Beck & Toft, 2000; Mayntz & Toft, 2000; Bilde & Soren, 2001; Harwood et al ., 2003; Nyffeler & Sunderland, 2003), planthoppers (Wang et al ., 2016; Wang et al ., 2017), psyllids (Petráková et al ., 2016), medflies (Monzó et al ., 2010), lepidopterans (Quan et al ., 2011; Pérez‐Guerrero et al ., 2013; Senior et al ., 2016), and weevils (Vink & Kean, 2013). Whilst crop rotation disrupts biocontrol by many generalist predators, spider generation times often coincide with crop cycles, with early pest population establishment coinciding with peak spider abundances in Spring, thus facilitating early pest suppression (Riechert & Lockley, 1984; Symondson et al ., 2002; Harwood & Obrycki, 2005; Welch et al ., 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%