The role of straining and morphology in thermal conductivity of a set of Si–Ge superlattices and biomimetic Si–Ge nanocomposites

Abstract

The ability to alter the thermal and mechanical properties of nanostructures by tailoring nanoscale morphology has led to vast activity in applications such as high figure of merit (ZT) thermoelectric, microelectronic and optoelectronic devices. Two types of nanostructures that have gained significant attention are Si–Ge superlattices and Si–Ge biomimetic nanocomposites, in which one phase is distributed in the other phase in a staggered biomimetic manner similar to biological materials. A systematic comparison of the atomistic factors that affect their thermal behaviour under different extents of straining at a range of temperatures remains to be performed. In this investigation, such analyses are performed for a set of Si–Ge superlattices and Si–Ge biomimetic nanocomposites using non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) simulations at three different temperatures (400, 600 and 800 K) and at strain levels varying between −10% and 10%. Analyses indicate that the nanoscale morphology differences between the superlattices and the nanocomposites lead to a striking contrast in the phonon spectral density, interfacial thermal boundary resistance and thermal conductivity. In the case of the nanocomposites, morphology variation at the nanoscale and the tensile or compressive straining at temperatures from 400 to 800 K do not have a significant effect on the changes in thermal conductivity values. Such factors, however, strongly influence the thermal conductivity of superlattices. The thickness of the nanocomposites, however, is found to influence the thermal conductivity values significantly under straining, with the effect of straining increasing with increasing nanocomposite thickness. A relation based on the effective medium approach is shown to fit the NEMD calculated nanocomposite thermal conductivity values.

Understanding straining induced changes in thermal properties of tropocollagen-hydroxyapatite interfacial configurations

“…This leads to the increase of the thermal conductivity when applying compressive or tensile strain, which agrees with the observed trend in the variation of thermal conductivity of the nanocomposite with needle shaped HAP minerals as a function of strain [red curve Figure 9(c)]. In order to explain the variation of thermal conductivity with straining, we can rewrite equation (9) as (Bhowmick and Shenoy, 2006;Samvedi and Tomar, 2010).…”

An ab initio study of ZrB2–SiC interface strength as a function of temperature: Correlating phononic and electronic thermal contributions

“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] All of the reported studies have focused on phonon mediated conductive thermal transport and have addressed electron-phonon correlation from classical point of view. This paper improves upon understanding gained from such earlier works by incorporating an all electron approach that explicitly addresses combined phonon and electron mediated conductive transport through a material interface as a function of strain and at a range of temperatures from 500 K to 2500 K.…”

Raman Thermometry Based Thermal Conductivity Measurement of Bovine Cortical Bone as a Function of Compressive Stress

“…According to Fig. Samvedi and Tomar [49] have earlier presented a model that accounts for biomimetic arrangement of interfaces in determining thermal conduc tivity of a set of Si-Ge biomimetic materials as a function of stress and temperature. Thermal transport occurs due to the migration of free electrons and lattice vibration waves.…”