2019
DOI: 10.17269/s41997-019-00219-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of structural violence in family homelessness

Abstract: Objective This study examines the impacts of structural violence on women and how this can influence their trajectory into and their sustainable exits from homelessness. Methods The research is qualitative and community-based, including 15 interviews with mothers living in emergency shelters and a group interview with nine professionals. An advisory group was formed through partnership with community services to provide project oversight and guide and interpret the results. A member check group consisting of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other structural violence research our analysis was able to indicate structural-level factors that exacerbate inequities and produce reproductive injustices. Similar to Milaney et al [ 34 ], we could see patterns of gendered injustices, structural barriers to receiving support and disconnected services that exacerbate trauma. Adding longitudinal social network analysis might enable more nuanced perspectives on root origins of inequities and offer ideas for solutions [ 32 ] that tie structural violence to a broader theoretical framework and can offer a stronger mandate for action [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similar to other structural violence research our analysis was able to indicate structural-level factors that exacerbate inequities and produce reproductive injustices. Similar to Milaney et al [ 34 ], we could see patterns of gendered injustices, structural barriers to receiving support and disconnected services that exacerbate trauma. Adding longitudinal social network analysis might enable more nuanced perspectives on root origins of inequities and offer ideas for solutions [ 32 ] that tie structural violence to a broader theoretical framework and can offer a stronger mandate for action [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Mothers were prohibited from inhabiting safe spaces, as no spaces in their lives were truly safe. Safety, including access to spaces free from violence, discrimination, and surveillance can be limited for those experiencing homelessness (Bullock, Truong, & Chhun, 2017), with particular vulnerability for mothers and their children (Milaney et al., 2017). Study participants described their lack of safety before, after, and during homelessness within private (e.g., homes where violence or trauma occurred), institutional (e.g., shelters, health-care organizations), and public spaces (e.g., city streets, buses).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mothers experiencing homelessness live at the intersection of multiple compounding sources of inequity in a hierarchical society that devalues the lives of women (Neysmith, 1995) and mothers (O’Reilly, 2016). Similar to the homeless population in general, mothers experiencing homelessness face significant health consequences related to homelessness, such as high rates of mortality and multiple acute and chronic health conditions (Fazel, Geddes, & Kushel, 2014; Hwang, Wilkins, Tjepkema, O’Campo, & Dunn, 2009); however, researchers have recognized how the presence of children and gender-specific vulnerabilities adds complexity to homelessness for mothers (Milaney, Ramage, Yang Fang, & Louis, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] Structural violence manifests as unequal access to social systems of support like housing, health care, education and employment. [12] For example, the inability for individuals with “no fixed address” to receive coverage for healthcare or social services demonstrates how structural violence could stand in the way of addressing fundamental human needs. [13,14] Despite the impact of these structures on some of the most underserved patients, with few exceptions, primary care practitioners are not trained to influence such social forces[11] nor do they consistently have the capacity to adequately address their related social determinants of health [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%