Sulfur in Proteins 1959
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-395705-4.50015-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Sulfur in Some Metal-Proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
2

Year Published

1965
1965
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These will decrease the flux density of the early afterglow to go beyond the limits of the detector. In the era of Swift , many early optical and X‐ray afterglows will be detected by UVOT and XRT, such as GRB 050525A (Klotz et al 2005; Shao & Dai 2005), and then the parameters may be determined by early afterglow data more precisely.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These will decrease the flux density of the early afterglow to go beyond the limits of the detector. In the era of Swift , many early optical and X‐ray afterglows will be detected by UVOT and XRT, such as GRB 050525A (Klotz et al 2005; Shao & Dai 2005), and then the parameters may be determined by early afterglow data more precisely.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these data have been analyzed according to the theory of multiple equilibria and equation (1). 14,15 v/C = (vma-v)kint-1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the apparent binding constant was 50-70 for homogenate (Figure 4), 15-25 for myosin B in 0.02 m KC1, and 40-60 in 0.2 m KC1 (Figure 5). Concentrations where higher values of V would be expected gave anomalous experimental results, probably because of the increase in solubility of myosin at [PCP] > 10-1 m. This is undoubtedly related to the interactions of an insoluble protein with organic ions being unlike those of a soluble protein, thus yielding varying proportions of solid and aqueous phases as described by Klotz (1953). Anionic vs. Cationic Binding Sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%