1974
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(74)90177-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of sulfur trapped in micropores in the catalytic partial oxidation of hydrogen sulfide with oxygen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
111
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that sense, the higher reactivity of some samples (samples PN1 and PTI with respect to sample SB1, Figure 2) can be explained. As sulfurization progresses, be-cause the deposited terminal sulfur acts as a catalyst for the oxidation reaction (Steijns and Mars, 1974), no difference should be expected in the demercuriating behavior of all fibrous silicates, except that derived from sulfurization temperature and accessibility of the active sulfur present. Especially long particles, as in micronized sepiolite samples, which are quite suitable for sulfur retention, produce a deletereous effect on mercury retention by forming a "shell" of sulfur, which hinders the diffusion of reacting gases inside the adsorbent mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that sense, the higher reactivity of some samples (samples PN1 and PTI with respect to sample SB1, Figure 2) can be explained. As sulfurization progresses, be-cause the deposited terminal sulfur acts as a catalyst for the oxidation reaction (Steijns and Mars, 1974), no difference should be expected in the demercuriating behavior of all fibrous silicates, except that derived from sulfurization temperature and accessibility of the active sulfur present. Especially long particles, as in micronized sepiolite samples, which are quite suitable for sulfur retention, produce a deletereous effect on mercury retention by forming a "shell" of sulfur, which hinders the diffusion of reacting gases inside the adsorbent mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfurized active carbon has been extensively studied as an adsorbent (Sinha and Walker, 1972;Lovett and Cunniff, 1974;Steijns and Mars, 1974) and developed by companies, such as Norit and Montedison, but drawbacks are its high cost and low possibilities of mercury recovery once the adsorbent is saturated. In the development of a less expensive and more recoverable adsorbent, some natural or slightly treated silicates appear to be promising materials, because they possess a developed network of pores and a large surface area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for the observations mentioned above, might be that the concentration of radicals per volume of sulfur is dependent on the type of microporous material and the degree of filling of the micropore volume of a material with sulfur. The high initial oxidation rates are probably caused by impurities like ironoxide (1) (Figs. 3c and 4c).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Mercury Chemisorption With The Activity Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the selective oxidation of hydrogen sulfide we found that the product sulfur catalyses the reaction (1). This sulfur deposits during the reaction in the pores of a material and it may possess a high surface area, causing autocatalysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selective-oxidation method with molecular 0, has been shown to be more effective for treating lower concentration H , S (<lo volume %) especially removing trace quantities of H,S from a gas stream rather than for producing a large amount of sulfur, which could be efficiently accomplished by the Claus process (Steijns and Mars, 1974;Ghosh and Tollefson, 1986). …”
Section: Oxidization Of H2s By 0mentioning
confidence: 99%