1966
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-42-3-371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Tetrathionate in the Oxidation of Thiosulphate by Chromatium sp. strain D

Abstract: SUMMARYSulphate was progressively replaced by tetrathionate as the end product of thiosulphate oxidation by suspensions of Chromatium D when the pH value was decreased from 7-3 to 6-25; tetrathionate was not itself oxidized to sulphate within this range. The effect of pH value on the oxidation of endogenous sulphur was less marked than on the production of sulphate from thiosulphate. Extracts of Chromatium D catalysed the oxidation of thiosulphate to tetrathionate in the presence of ferricyanide; pH 5.0 was th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A thiosulphate dehydrogenase is responsible for the oxidation to tetrathionate, while a sox gene‐encoded multienzyme complex is essential for the oxidation to sulphate. In conjunction with its localization in the bacterial periplasm, the low pH optimum of 4.25 for the A. vinosum thiosulphate dehydrogenase is in full agreement with the observation that whole cells preferably form tetrathionate from thiosulphate at pH values below 7.0 while sulphate is the main product under alkaline conditions (Smith, 1966; Smith and Lascelles, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A thiosulphate dehydrogenase is responsible for the oxidation to tetrathionate, while a sox gene‐encoded multienzyme complex is essential for the oxidation to sulphate. In conjunction with its localization in the bacterial periplasm, the low pH optimum of 4.25 for the A. vinosum thiosulphate dehydrogenase is in full agreement with the observation that whole cells preferably form tetrathionate from thiosulphate at pH values below 7.0 while sulphate is the main product under alkaline conditions (Smith, 1966; Smith and Lascelles, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The properties of thiosulphate dehydrogenase from A. vinosum characterized during this study are compatible with older data presented by Smith (1966) and Fukumori and Yamanaka (1979). In both reports a tetrathionateforming activity with a pH optimum in the acidic range was described.…”
Section: Tetrathionate-forming Thiosulphate Dehydrogenase Is An Acidosupporting
confidence: 93%
“…3a). As expected for C. vinostlm at neutral to slightly acidic pH (Smith, 1966), both wild-type and mutant strain oxidized thiosulphate partly to sulphate with an intermediary formation of intracellular sulphur and partly to tetrathionate, which was not further metabolized ( Fig. 3c, d).…”
Section: Biochemical and Physiological Characterization Of Mutant Strmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…vinosum (Smith 1966;Smith and Lascelles 1966;Hashwa 1975;Fukumori and Yamanaka 1979b), alternate sulfide-oxidizing systems have been heretofore unknown. We readily detected sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase activity in crude extracts of the wild-type and mutant FD1, and suggest that sulfide oxidation in Chr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected for Chr. vinosum during photolithoautotrophic growth at neutral to slightly acidic pH (Smith 1966), the wild-type and the mutant oxidized thiosulfate (1.5 mM) partly to tetrathionate and partly to sulfate when grown in batch culture at pH 7 (not shown). The ratio of tetrathionate/sulfate formed did not differ significantly in both strains and was in the same range as observed earlier for Chr.…”
Section: Strainmentioning
confidence: 91%