2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.01.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the estrogen receptor α in the medial preoptic area in sexual incentive motivation, proceptivity and receptivity, anxiety, and wheel running in female rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
55
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Oestrogen regulates many aspects of female reproduction (reviewed in Hewitt et al, 2005), including various sexual and maternal behaviours (Ghiraldi et al, 1993;Spiteri et al, 2012). We found that oestrogen levels were higher in returners than in communal and solitary breeders (with or without relatives).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Oestrogen regulates many aspects of female reproduction (reviewed in Hewitt et al, 2005), including various sexual and maternal behaviours (Ghiraldi et al, 1993;Spiteri et al, 2012). We found that oestrogen levels were higher in returners than in communal and solitary breeders (with or without relatives).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Global knockouts of Tac1 or the SP receptor (NK-1) exhibit improved glucose homeostasis (Karagiannides et al, 2011a) and resistance to diet-induced obesity (Karagiannides et al, 2011b); unfortunately both studies only report data from male mice. ERα + , Tac1 + VMH neurons may project to MPOA neurons, which have been linked to estrogen-induced running in rats (Fahrbach et al, 1985; Spiteri et al, 2012). Other VMH projections relevant to locomotion might include those to the subthalamic and mesencephalic locomotor regions (SLR and MLR)(Cheung et al, 2012), areas that when activated increase controlled movement in rats (Skinner and Garcia-Rill, 1984) or when lesioned in humans lead to deficits in locomotion (Hathout and Bhidayasiri, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes occurred in mice lacking ERα in the CNS despite the fact that circulating E 2 was elevated, suggesting that ERα signaling in peripheral tissues did not compensate for the suppression of ERα signaling in the CNS. Silencing of ERα in the medial preoptic area also resulted in a decrease in locomotor activity 36 . In contrast, deleting ERα in pro-opiomelanocortin neurons resulted in increased energy intake and increased, rather than decreased, energy expenditure 20 .…”
Section: Basic Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%