2016
DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2016.1202323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the formal written curriculum in standards-based reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A national curriculum is used to achieve the intended educational goals at the national level and guides and regulates educational processes (Oliva, 1997). Whilst teaching practices could be more direct about learning outcomes, the failure of educational reform may be owing to ambiguous meanings in formal teaching documents (such as curricula), as well as the methods and practices used (Bergqvist & Bergqvist, 2017;Cuban, 2013;Fullan, 2001). Moreover, a national curriculum is not a neutral assemblage of knowledge; instead 'it is produced out of cultural, political and economic conflicts, tensions and compromises' (Apple, 1993, p.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A national curriculum is used to achieve the intended educational goals at the national level and guides and regulates educational processes (Oliva, 1997). Whilst teaching practices could be more direct about learning outcomes, the failure of educational reform may be owing to ambiguous meanings in formal teaching documents (such as curricula), as well as the methods and practices used (Bergqvist & Bergqvist, 2017;Cuban, 2013;Fullan, 2001). Moreover, a national curriculum is not a neutral assemblage of knowledge; instead 'it is produced out of cultural, political and economic conflicts, tensions and compromises' (Apple, 1993, p.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is tempting to consider the results of this study in terms of East and West. We know that the Swedish national curriculum is influenced by the same reform ideas as expressed in the NCTM (1989,2000) Standards and Adding it up (Kilpatrick et al, 2001) (Bergqvist & Bergqvist, 2017). This could explain the focus on the meaning of the equal sign and the functional approach.…”
Section: -9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As instruments for governing education and promoting school‐based reform (Lavrenteva & Orland‐Barak, 2015; Mølstad & Hansén, 2013), national policies constitute “the masterplan” whose implementation schools and teachers are legally accountable for. However, its effectiveness is contingent upon the clarity of the “message” being conveyed to practitioners since words with vague or highly specialized meanings can lead to a multiplicity of local interpretations and inconsistent classroom enactments (Bergqvist & Bergqvist, 2017; Hill, 2001). Such a requirement gives rise to a complex situation when involving technology, since policy‐makers are faced with the challenging task of sending a clear message about what remains a theoretically and philosophically nebulous concept.…”
Section: Technology In the Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%