Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a multifocal demyelinating disease with progressive neurodegeneration caused by an autoimmune response to self-antigens in a genetically susceptible individual. While the formation and persistence of meningeal lymphoid follicles suggest persistence of antigens to drive the continuing inflammatory and humoral response, the identity of an antigen or infectious agent leading to the oligoclonal expansion of B and T cells is unknown. In this review we examine new paradigms for understanding the immunopathology of MS, present recent data defining the common genetic variants underlying disease susceptibility, and explore how improved understanding of immune pathway disruption can inform MS prognosis and treatment decisions.
IntroductionMS is a multifocal demyelinating disease with progressive neurodegeneration caused by an autoimmune response to self-antigens in a genetically susceptible individual. Clinical symptoms vary based on the site of neurologic lesions and often correlate with invasion of inflammatory cells across the blood-brain barrier with resulting demyelination and edema (1). Patients often exhibit an initial clinically isolated syndrome, followed by a series of subacute clinical events that spontaneously abate, referred to as relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). While patients generally return to near normal neurologic function at the cessation of each episode, over a variable period of time there can be irreversible progression of clinical disability termed secondary progressive MS (SPMS), although early therapeutic intervention may delay time to progression (2, 3). However, 10%-15% of MS patients will instead experience primary progressive MS, characterized by clinical progression from the initiation of disease without preceding relapses and remissions (4).The diagnosis is made primarily on the basis of the medical history and physical exam, which was formalized as the McDonald criteria and updated to reflect the increased reliance on imaging for lesion identification (5-7). These criteria indicate that the neurologic lesions should be disseminated in both space and time to distinguish them from monophasic self-limiting diseases such as acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and additionally they should reflect a pattern of neurological inflammation typical of MS in the absence of a more appropriate diagnosis. A diagnosis of MS reflects clinical evaluation of episodes of intermittent neurological impairment and may take into account laboratory data, such as the characteristic oligoclonal bands in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which indicate intrathecal immunoglobulin production, or abnormal visual evoked responses in the absence of optic neuritis. Over the past two decades, the diagnosis has come to include the more sensitive and specific spatial identification of white matter lesions via evaluation of T2-hyperintense lesions and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions on MRI (8). Gadolinium enhancement serves as a marker of focal inflammation when the dye leaks through vessels due to the ...