2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the natural aquatic environment in the dissemination of extended spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase encoding genes: A scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…latest test for the rapid detection of the five groups of CTX-M-producing Enterobacterales, as previously reported (Bernabeu et al, 2020). As observed in other studies, group 1 CTX-Mproducing E. coli isolates were dominant in our study (Zarfel et al, 2017;Hooban et al, 2020). As commonly found in CTX-M-producers, most isolates were multidrug resistant, possessing aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme [e.g., aac(6 )-Ib, aadA1, aadA5, or aph(3 )-Ia], quinolone-resistance genes (qnrS1), tetracycline (tetA, tetB), chloramphenicol (catB3), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (dfrA14, dfrA17, sul1, and sul2).…”
Section: Resistome Analysessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…latest test for the rapid detection of the five groups of CTX-M-producing Enterobacterales, as previously reported (Bernabeu et al, 2020). As observed in other studies, group 1 CTX-Mproducing E. coli isolates were dominant in our study (Zarfel et al, 2017;Hooban et al, 2020). As commonly found in CTX-M-producers, most isolates were multidrug resistant, possessing aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme [e.g., aac(6 )-Ib, aadA1, aadA5, or aph(3 )-Ia], quinolone-resistance genes (qnrS1), tetracycline (tetA, tetB), chloramphenicol (catB3), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (dfrA14, dfrA17, sul1, and sul2).…”
Section: Resistome Analysessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, it remains difficult to conclude on the original source of these isolates, which could be of avian/environmental or human sources. Hooban et al (2020) reported that most of the ESBL producers identified in aquatic environments around the world between 2010 and 2017 expressed bla CTX−M genes (n = 21 among 29 studies), followed by bla TEM (n = 18), and bla SHV (n = 11). Surprisingly, among eight Chinese studies, only three identified CTX-M-producing E. coli FIGURE 1 | Phylogenetic tree of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli from Seine River.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several ecological factors that explain the community transmission of ESBL-E. As mentioned before, George et al [ 26 ] found that the contact with open sewage drains and public toilets could explain ESBL-E foci at the community level. As geographic mapping can assist in hypothesis formulation, we think of two hypothesis: (i) the interaction between tertiary hospitals and the community and; (ii) nearby rivers can be a source of antimicrobial resistance in the community because, it has been mentioned that the natural aquatic environment can be a contributor to the development and circulation of antibiotic resistance genes [ 35 ]. Otun River is highlighted as it is used for recreational purposes and settlements of the poultry industry are near the river bank.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point and nonpoint sources contribute to the presence and proliferation of AMR bacteria and ARGs in surface waters [9,[34][35][36]. Figure 1 shows the known sources of resistance contaminants and how they could potentially contribute to recreational water exposures to AMR bacteria and ARGs [34,36,73,82]. Feasible pathways of movement for AMR bacteria and ARGs vary for the different potential sources, depending on factors including, but not limited to, local regulations and industrial practices.…”
Section: Anthropogenic Sources Of Antibiotic Resistance In Recreationmentioning
confidence: 99%