2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the posterior fossa in developing Chiari I malformation in children with craniosynostosis syndromes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,39,40 Children with craniosynostosis and tonsillar herniation have a higher ratio between cerebellar and posterior fossa volume compared with age-matched controls (0.77 vs. 0.75, p ¼ 0.008). 41 In addition, in children with craniosynostosis, the surface area of the foramen magnum is smaller compared with controls contributing to the conflict between the bony structures of the skull base and the brain stem. 42 In patients with shunted hydrocephalus, a tonsillar herniation is a common feature of the "overdrainage" constellation of features.…”
Section: Overcrowding Caused By a Small Skull And/or Posterior Fossamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,39,40 Children with craniosynostosis and tonsillar herniation have a higher ratio between cerebellar and posterior fossa volume compared with age-matched controls (0.77 vs. 0.75, p ¼ 0.008). 41 In addition, in children with craniosynostosis, the surface area of the foramen magnum is smaller compared with controls contributing to the conflict between the bony structures of the skull base and the brain stem. 42 In patients with shunted hydrocephalus, a tonsillar herniation is a common feature of the "overdrainage" constellation of features.…”
Section: Overcrowding Caused By a Small Skull And/or Posterior Fossamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All MRI was performed on a 1.5 T scanner (GE Healthcare, MR Signa Excite HD, Little Chalfont, UK) and the imaging protocol included a 3D T1‐weighted fast spoiled gradient‐echo magnetic resonance sequence. Imaging parameters for craniosynostosis patients were as follows: 2mm slice thickness, no slice gap; field of view 22.4cm; matrix size 224×224; in plane resolution of 1mm; echo time 3.1ms; and repetition time 9.9ms …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All MRI scans were performed on a 1.5 T scanner (GE Healthcare, MR Signa Excite HD, Little Chalfont, UK) with the imaging protocol, including a three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient echo T1-weighted MR sequence. Imaging parameters for craniosynostosis patients were the following: 2 mm slice thickness, no slice gap; field of view (FOV): 22.4 cm; matrix size: 224 × 224; in plane resolution of 1 mm; echo time : 3.1 ms; and repetition time: 9.9 ms. 22 MRI was the imaging modality of choice in this study because of its ability to adequately distinguish between tissue densities (white matter, grey matter, and dura) critical to the calculation of cerebral cortical thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%