2009
DOI: 10.4161/pri.3.3.9771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the prion protein membrane anchor in prion infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56 Thus, in vitro, the presence of PrP C at the cell surface is a prerequisite for efficient conversion to PrP Sc . 57 Taken together, these reports indicate that PrP C localization in lipid raft-enriched domains is of high importance for prion conversion. Interestingly, only when the amyloidogenic yeast protein Sup35 is attached to a GPI-anchor, it can be propagated to neighboring cells and these cells can then sustain and propagate the aggregates for many passages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…56 Thus, in vitro, the presence of PrP C at the cell surface is a prerequisite for efficient conversion to PrP Sc . 57 Taken together, these reports indicate that PrP C localization in lipid raft-enriched domains is of high importance for prion conversion. Interestingly, only when the amyloidogenic yeast protein Sup35 is attached to a GPI-anchor, it can be propagated to neighboring cells and these cells can then sustain and propagate the aggregates for many passages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Cell culture and transgenic-mouse studies have established that the C-terminal GPI anchor is not required for PrP RES formation but is necessary for PrP RES propagation between cells and for cytopathology (28). Altering the location of PrP C from the cell surface to the transmembrane domain prevents PrP C conversion (5,29,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease resistance of this mutant has stimulated research into the impact of GPIanchoring on prion trafficking and disease progression, both in vitro and in vivo. [39] In vivo genetic screens Not surprisingly, genetic methods have proven to be powerful for identifying genes involved in GPI-related processes. Genetic screens have been a major tool in elucidating the GPI biosynthetic pathway, as well as discovering the subunits of GPI-T, typically in combination with other techniques like lipid profiling by thin-layer chromatography (TLC).…”
Section: In Vivo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prion diseases are neurodegenerative conditions propagated by abnormal misfolded prion protein (PrP C is susceptible to phospholipase digestion; this indicates that the conformational change results in obstruction of the phospholipase cleavage site. [113] Although the GPI anchor is believed to exert significant influence on prion infectivity, [39] conflicting results make the impact of the GPI anchor unclear. Cells expressing anchorless PrP were resistant to persistent scrapie infection in vitro, although some PrP Sc was detected within the first 96 h of infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%