The Role of the Professional Supervisor in the Audiometric Testing Component of Hearing Conservation Programs

Mirza, Raúl A; Kirchner, Donald B.

doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000001424

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They review problematic audiograms and perform baseline revisions, determine work relatedness, conduct follow-up for work-related auditory disorders, and manage audiometric databases. [ 11 12 ]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Audiologist’s Role in University Hearing Conservation Programs

Veith

2021

Noise and Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: All universities that meet state and/or federal requirements for employees’ noise exposure must have a hearing conservation program (HCP). Universities with HCPs and Doctor of Audiology (AuD) programs could reap a range of benefits from interprofessional collaboration between these programs, including enhanced learning opportunities for AuD students; however, it is unclear whether this collaboration occurs consistently in different university settings. Despite a relatively robust literature around occupational audiology and the audiologist’s role in hearing conservation in general, few studies examine this subject in the university setting. Aim: This study seeks to provide insights into the role of the university audiologists in university HCPs that could help inform further exploration and potential pilot studies to enhance university-based occupational HCPs, ultimately supporting more rigorous professional training in occupational audiology in AuD programs. Method: This study’s primary method was a survey questionnaire delivered to audiologists at U.S. universities. Survey questions explored university audiologists’ role, involvement with their universities’ HCPs, and benefits and barriers to collaboration with the HCPs. Results: The results indicate that although audiologists report that they have participated in hearing conservation generally at their universities, the majority of respondents were not actively involved with occupational HCPs. Conclusion: Further research is needed to understand how university HCPs are managed and how effective they are. With greater awareness of audiologists’ contributions to university HCPs, their role in this important workplace program could merit expansion.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%