1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90039-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the prosthodontist in restoring root-resected molars: A study of 70 molar root resections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality of root resection: Any radiographic ledges, furcation lips, residual root fragments or concavities created during the resective procedure were considered as unsatisfactory resective treatment (Newell 1991). Caries: if there was any sign of clinical (reported in record) and/or radiographic caries found on any root surface.…”
Section: Post-resective Therapy Clinical Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality of root resection: Any radiographic ledges, furcation lips, residual root fragments or concavities created during the resective procedure were considered as unsatisfactory resective treatment (Newell 1991). Caries: if there was any sign of clinical (reported in record) and/or radiographic caries found on any root surface.…”
Section: Post-resective Therapy Clinical Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newell [6] examined 70 root resected molars in 62 patients for the quality of the resections. Twenty-one (30%) of the resections were considered faulty when subgingival, residual roots, furcal lips, and/or ledges were present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Furthermore, radiographic identification of residual ledges or lips is difficult in maxillary molar resections. [13] Hence, a smooth resected surface without ledges or furcal lips is desirable. Vertical cut method of resection employed in this case, apart from reducing occlusal forces, allows smoothening of furcation due to good visibility and provides a desirable angle for resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%