The Role of the Startup Competition and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in the Integration of Entrepreneurship Education Within the Algerian Universities

Dif, Aicha; Bourane, Soumia; Benziane, Abdelbaki

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94709-9_14

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These authors state that creative innovation means invention, creativity, improvement and/or offering new products or services for the commercial market for the first time, and this may include new processes and management concepts. This is in sync with (Dif et al, 2018) who also stated that creative innovation is application of knowledge to create new things and offer them to the commercial market in the form of new products, new services and new production processes. Creative innovation is always based on the idea that has never been presented to the market before, thus, benefits from it are also achieved in a brand new and creative way.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 67%

Thailand 4.0’S Innovation and Startup Performance: Analyzing the Indicator Level

Potjanajaruwit

2019

EUrASEANs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this research is to study the level of startups’ creative innovations and business performance under the national programme Thailand 4.0. The research is using mixed methods, and the population of this study consists of entrepreneurs and executives, including those who are directly participating in the development of creative innovations in Thailand. The research findings indicate that there are three main variables of creative innovation, namely: (1) Learning Innovation, (2) Communication Innovation, and (3) Operational Support Innovation. The Communication Innovation was ranked No. 1 as it has the highest mean (x̄ = 4.29, S.D. = 0.51) while the 2nd rank was assigned to Learning Innovation with the highest mean (x̄ = 4.25, S.D. = 0.51), the 3rd rank got Operational Support Innovation with the highest mean (x̄ = 4.22, S.D. = 0.55), all variables were found to be statistically significant.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 67%

Thailand 4.0’S Innovation and Startup Performance: Analyzing the Indicator Level

Potjanajaruwit

2019

EUrASEANs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These organisations could include, for instance, business associations, the Desenvolvimento Local de Base Comunitária (Local Development of a Community Base), cooperatives and incubators. According to Dif et al (2018) and Maritz et al (2015), entrepreneurial ecosystems allow local actors to create networks promoting innovation and entrepreneurship, thereby contributing to regional development. Finally, based on the present study’s interviews and questionnaires, a proposal for how best to improve the SEP was developed (see Table III).…”

Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Entrepreneurship programmes’ success is also often associated with institutional support provided by the relevant entities in the surrounding region (Petrin, 1994). If this support includes intense interactions between important stakeholders, it may sometimes give rise to an entrepreneurial ecosystem (Dif et al , 2018; Moore, 1996).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems grew out of Moore’s (1996) research, which sought to explain economic communities’ creation of innovation values. These types of ecosystems are centred around interdependent actors who share a vision of value creation and work through networks or organisations to promote innovation and productive entrepreneurship within specific regions (Dif et al , 2018; Moore, 1996). According to Mazzarol (2014), entrepreneurial ecosystems comprise a model or strategy that nourishes economic development in order to promote entrepreneurship, small business growth and innovation.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stakeholders can play an extremely important role in the implementation, evaluation and restructuring of entrepreneurship programmes as these actors can positively or negatively influence the programmes’ success (Bischoff et al , 2018). In addition, stakeholders’ participation and interconnections can contribute to developing more entrepreneurial ecosystems (Dif et al , 2018; Moore, 1996).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of an entrepreneurship training programme: a proposal for new guidelines

Galvão

Marques

Ferreira

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate an entrepreneurship training and education programme, which has already had five editions in the Sabor region of Portugal’s northern interior. This evaluation was conducted in order to propose new guidelines to improve the Sabor Entrepreneurship Programme (SEP). Design/methodology/approach The research included primary data collection using mixed methods (i.e. quantitative and qualitative). Questionnaires were distributed to 103 entrepreneurs who participated in the SEP, and interviews were conducted with entities involved in developing this programme. The data were processed using cross-sectional content analysis of the interviews and descriptive analysis of the completed questionnaires in order to ascertain the opinions of all the parties involved in the SEP. Findings The results show that the SEP has been modified throughout the five editions, which has contributed to better performance. Based on the findings, new guidelines were proposed for the programme, such as the implementation of new phases and improvement of various methods used. The proposed phases include the validation and full development of business ideas, management decision training for entrepreneurs, help with financing solutions and support during new companies’ first three years. The results also indicate that the SEP needs to create an entrepreneurial ecosystem that includes public policies and the involvement of other local entities that are active in the region and that have the skills entrepreneurs need. Originality/value This study’s findings have theoretical and practical implications, which provide empirical evidence of how evaluating entrepreneurship education and training programmes can make them more effective and efficient. In addition, the results contribute to the evolution of the existing knowledge about entrepreneurial ecosystems.

show abstract

Entrepreneurial culture in educational institutions: A scoping review

Al-Lawati

Kohar

Suleiman

2022

Cogent Business & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Role of the Startup Competition and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in the Integration of Entrepreneurship Education Within the Algerian Universities

Cited by 11 publications

References 16 publications

Thailand 4.0’S Innovation and Startup Performance: Analyzing the Indicator Level

Thailand 4.0’S Innovation and Startup Performance: Analyzing the Indicator Level

Evaluation of an entrepreneurship training programme: a proposal for new guidelines

Entrepreneurial culture in educational institutions: A scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About