1980
DOI: 10.3758/bf03326442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the superior colliculus in visually guided locomotion and visual orienting in the hamster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, under more reflexive conditions the se quence of orienting in all vertebrates, and prey cap ture in the case of predatory animals, may be elicited by tectal circuits with their crude shape discrimina tion, but in situations requiring careful check, orien tation and approach are dependent on other (prob ably forebrain) circuits, as suggested by Schneider [1969] and Mort et al [1980],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, under more reflexive conditions the se quence of orienting in all vertebrates, and prey cap ture in the case of predatory animals, may be elicited by tectal circuits with their crude shape discrimina tion, but in situations requiring careful check, orien tation and approach are dependent on other (prob ably forebrain) circuits, as suggested by Schneider [1969] and Mort et al [1980],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only is the brain redundantly organized in this regard (Lomber et al 2001;Schall 1997;Schiller et al 1979;Tehovnik et al 1994), but the loss of a superordinate function in a layered control architecture does not disable the system as a whole (Brooks 1986(Brooks , 1989Prescott et al 1999), just as a well organized army need not cease functioning on the loss of its commander. A macaque with experimental collicular lesions is not incapable of moving its eyes onto targets, but exhibits a reduced variety of eye and orienting movements and is indistractible, a common finding in other species as well (Albano & Wurtz 1978;Casagrande & Diamond 1974;Denny-Brown 1962; Goodale & Murison 1975;Merker 1980;Mort et al 1980;Schiller et al 1979;Schneider 1967). This may reflect a compromised scope and sophistication of target selection, and the role of the intact colliculus would accordingly instantiate the Penfield and Jasper conception of a highest integrative function which, while anatomically subcortical, is functionally supra-cortical.…”
Section: Target Selection In the Midbrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lesion that impairs scanning would therefore be likely to have less effect on discrimination learning in rats than in animals with a better developed area centralis or a fovea. It is interesting to note that in hamsters, which have very similar retinae to rats (Tiao and Blakemore, 1976), collicular lesions can also disturb scanning but not discrimination learning (Mort, Cairns, Hersch and Finlay, 1980). This explanation of the present results may not be incompatible with observations that collicular lesions do impair discrimination learning in rats and hamsters in particular circumstances.…”
Section: I54mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, Dyer et al (1976) found no such impairment in a similar apparatus after collicular lesions in rats, and Mort et al (1980) failed to find an effect of collicular lesions on the path lengths of hamsters learning a difficult visual discrimination. Since the two animals in Schneider's study that showed very marked approach errors were the two with large cerebellar lesions (Schneider, 1966, pp.…”
Section: I54mentioning
confidence: 81%