2019
DOI: 10.1111/saje.12214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Trade Policies in Building Regional Value Chains – Some Preliminary Evidence From Africa

Abstract: Regional value chains (RVCs) are considered as an important step towards greater integration into global value chains (GVCs), but African countries trade very little value added with each other. Based on the UNCTAD‐Eora GVC database, this paper estimates a panel model from 2006 to 2012 for 37 African countries and sheds light on the role of trade costs in building RVCs in Africa. First evidence is provided for a significantly negative effect on foreign value added of charged tariffs on capital goods and higher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
20
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the global level, statistics show that between 1991 and 2012, Africa adds value to only 14% of its exports, compared to 27% for emerging Asian countries and 31% for developed countries (IMF, 2015; Mouanda‐Mouanda, 2019; World Bank et al, 2017). At the regional level, intra‐African trade in value‐added is low (9%), compared to 45% in Asia and 18% in Latin America (Slany, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the global level, statistics show that between 1991 and 2012, Africa adds value to only 14% of its exports, compared to 27% for emerging Asian countries and 31% for developed countries (IMF, 2015; Mouanda‐Mouanda, 2019; World Bank et al, 2017). At the regional level, intra‐African trade in value‐added is low (9%), compared to 45% in Asia and 18% in Latin America (Slany, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Southern Africa was also found to be the most integrated region. There are notable differences in the focus and approach adopted by Slany (2017) and this current paper. First, the former uses foreign value added flows as the dependent variable and uses this indicator as a measure of backward participation of a country in RVCs.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fourth, the former is silent on the need to control for the role of regional trade agreements as this play crucial roles on international value chains -be it regional or global. The fifth difference is in the technique adopted, as bilateral trade flows are usually characterized by the preponderance of zeros -this however applies to this current study and not Slany (2017) because of the indicator used by the latter as the dependent variable. Sixth, following from the nature of the dependent variable used by Slany (2017) -foreign value added in exports, which has both an import and export side -tariffs faced and charged are both included in the model.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, regional and global trade regimes can significantly influence lead firms' geographies of sourcing (Curran et al, 2019). Using intra-regional trade in value-added as an indicator of participation in RVCs, Slany (2019) finds that trade liberalization with a reduction of import tariffs on capital goods favoured countries' participation in RVCs across SSA. In the apparel sector, multilateral trade agreements granting preferential access to the EU and the US markets have been crucial in developing apparel GVCs across Africa, Asia, and South America (Bair, 2017;Pickles et.…”
Section: Public Governancementioning
confidence: 99%