The Role of Trust in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Critical Review

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the concept of trust within the domain of natural disaster management. Trust can be defined as a state of vulnerability where one party relies on another party with the expectation that the latter will carry out entrusted responsibilities without exploiting this inherent vulnerability. This comprehensive literature review is dedicated to the examination of research concerning community and institutional trust in the field of disaster risk reduction (DRR). Particular emphasis is placed on elucidating the influence of trust throughout the distinct phases of natural disaster management, namely prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery. The critical examination of the pertinent body of the literature demonstrates that trust plays a central role across the different phases of DRR, being positively associated with effective community responses and resilience. Hence, it becomes imperative to actively foster the development of trust at both institutional and community levels within the realm of DRR. This endeavor is essential for adequately preparing communities to confront natural disasters, crafting effective protocols to enhance community responsiveness and mitigate adverse consequences, and advancing strategies for successful reconstruction and recovery.

Psychological Trust Dynamics in Climate Change Adaptation Decision-Making Processes: A Literature Review

“…Accordingly, Moreno et al [69] argued that for communities to exhibit resilience in the face of natural hazards, a strong foundation of trust is needed. As observed elsewhere [1], trust and the perception of trustworthiness in the context of disaster risk reduction and CCA are dependent upon the responsiveness of institutions and community members, based on their capacity to communicate openly and handle the situation. Within this context, Kitagawa [70] examined the significance of promoting decision-making and participation through collaborative projects in community learning for disaster preparedness, emphasizing the need for the population's commitment and cooperation to prevent and mitigate anticipated large-scale disasters.…”

“…The CCA cycle consists of six steps [36]: (1) preparing the ground for adaptation, (2) assessing climate change risks and vulnerabilities, (3) identifying adaptation options, (4) assessing and selecting adaptation options, (5) implementing adaptation, and (6) monitoring and evaluating adaptation.…”

“…In recent years, researchers have shown a growing interest in examining the role of psychological trust dynamics in climate change adaptation (CCA). Academics and professionals across various fields, encompassing economics, law, psychology, and the social sciences, have acknowledged trust as a pivotal determinant impacting the extent of community responsiveness in the context of climate-related hazards [1,2]. This happens because the process of adjusting to climate change demands changes in attitudes and behaviors among millions of individuals.…”