2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Fat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, such methods are generally infeasible for use in large-scale epidemiological studies due to logistical, financial and ethical issues [4]. Ultrasonography has been demonstrated to be a valid, non-invasive, inexpensive, safe and widely available technique for estimating the size of abdominal fat depots [59]. A few previous studies evaluating intra- and subcutaneous abdominal fat by ultrasound have reported variation in these quantities according to gender, age group and ethnicity; however, those studies are generally restricted to small samples and specific age groups [57,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, such methods are generally infeasible for use in large-scale epidemiological studies due to logistical, financial and ethical issues [4]. Ultrasonography has been demonstrated to be a valid, non-invasive, inexpensive, safe and widely available technique for estimating the size of abdominal fat depots [59]. A few previous studies evaluating intra- and subcutaneous abdominal fat by ultrasound have reported variation in these quantities according to gender, age group and ethnicity; however, those studies are generally restricted to small samples and specific age groups [57,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to understand how the absence of a straight standardized protocol leads to a decrease in accuracy and reliability of US measurements of BC, mainly for visceral adiposity. In a recent study was demonstrated that reproducibility and repeatability, especially for visceral fat, were proved more stable in fasting state and expiration (37).…”
Section: Ultrasound (Us)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was significant heterogeneity in the literature, ranging from 3.5 to 12.5 MHz, mostly linear. Authors used probes with frequencies of 5 MHz 7.5 MHz or 12 to 12.5 MHz One author used a frequency of 3.5 MHz . Others used probes with multifrequency probes, ranging from 4 to 7 MHz, 5 to 8 MHz, 5 to 12 MHz and 12 to 15 MHz .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bazzocchi et al 15 studied the impact of a technological gap between ultrasound machines but found no significant difference. In the recent literature, the most common ultrasound machine makes used for abdominal SAT thickness measurement are the Technos MPX (Esaote S.p.A., Genova, Italy), 2,7,15,16 GE Logiq, 4,17-23 GE Voluson 730 Expert, 24,25 Aloka 500 SSD (Tokyo), 6,[26][27][28] and the Acuson Sequoia 512 (Siemens, Mountain Woods, California). 11,23,29 Transducer Frequency Because SAT is a very superficial layer, most studies were performed with high-frequency probes.…”
Section: Ultrasound Machine Make/modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation