2004
DOI: 10.1002/uog.1076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of ultrasound and fetal fibronectin in predicting the length of induced labor when the cervix is unfavorable

Abstract: ResultsThere was a significant correlation between duration of the latent phase and the whole of labor, and digitally assessed cervical dilatation (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively), parity (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001), the Bishop score (P = 0.019 and P = 0.003) and ultrasound-determined cervical length (P = 0.035 and P = 0.003). The length of the active phase of labor did not correlate with the cervical status. Funneling did not appear to be predictive of the duration of labor and it had a poor correlation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were also reported by Yang et al [19] . However, in three subsequent studies digital cervical examination and not cervical ultrasonographic assessment was the best predictor of successful labor induction [20][21][22] . We did not examine cervical wedging, as we believe that this is closely related to a short cervix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were also reported by Yang et al [19] . However, in three subsequent studies digital cervical examination and not cervical ultrasonographic assessment was the best predictor of successful labor induction [20][21][22] . We did not examine cervical wedging, as we believe that this is closely related to a short cervix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a cutoff of 27 mm we were able to identify 76% of those that delivered vaginally and 75.5% of those that gave birth by cesarean section. [13] Bishop score, cervical length cervical dilatation Gonen et al [14] cervical length, cervical wedge, Bishop score Bishop score Ware and Raynor [15] Bishop score, cervical length cervical length Gabriel et al [16] Bishop score, cervical length cervical length Paterson-Brown et al [17] Bishop score, cervical length, cervical wedge, cervical position, lower segment thickness Bishop score Pandis et al [18] Bishop score, cervical length cervical length Yang et al [19] Bishop score, cervical length, cervical wedge cervical length Chandra et al [20] Bishop score, cervical length, cervical wedge, cervical dilatation Bishop score Reis et al [21] Bishop score, cervical length, cervical wedge, fetal fi bronectin Bishop score Roman et al [22] Bishop score, cervical length cervical dilatation…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, if the standard deviation of one group is much higher than that of another while the means of both are similar, arbitrarily set cutoffs might reduce this bias. Similarly, Roman et al [21] found that the length of the latent phase and that of total labor were signifi cantly shorter in parous compared with nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor. However, these fi ndings are also in contrast with our results showing that parity was not signifi cantly associated with an increased risk of failed induction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cette association n'a cependant pas été démontrée dans d'autres études [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Rozenberg et al [36] remarquent, dans leur article, les nombreux biais des études retrouvant une association entre la longueur cervicale échographique et la durée du travail induit.…”
Section: é Chographieunclassified