2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of unusual pathogens in prostatitis syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
50
2
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
50
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the diagnosis of prostatitis is often given for any unexplained symptoms that arise from prostate gland disorders, ranging from inflammation to infection to pelvic pain [2]. Pathogenic microorganisms are considered to be among the most important causes of this condition [4,5,6]. Microorganisms such as Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and nanobacteria have roles in chronic prostatitis [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the diagnosis of prostatitis is often given for any unexplained symptoms that arise from prostate gland disorders, ranging from inflammation to infection to pelvic pain [2]. Pathogenic microorganisms are considered to be among the most important causes of this condition [4,5,6]. Microorganisms such as Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and nanobacteria have roles in chronic prostatitis [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogenic microorganisms are considered to be among the most important causes of this condition [4,5,6]. Microorganisms such as Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and nanobacteria have roles in chronic prostatitis [5,6]. Presently, ordinary bacterial culture often does not reflect the true status of prostatitis pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides traditional uropathogens (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus), unusual pathogens (Chlamydia trachomatis, other Gram1/2 pathogens, Trichomonas vaginalis, Mycoplasmata and Mycobacteria) are reputed to play a causative role in CBP in some cases. 3,4 Anaerobic bacteria have been proposed to play a pathogenic role in CBP on the basis of studies that show (i) a significant association between the evidence of prostatic infection by anaerobes and the presence of markers of inflammation in prostatic secretions; (ii) a clinical cure or remission following eradication of anaerobic pathogens in patients showing signs and symptoms of CBP; [5][6][7] and (iii) the detection of anaerobes in a higher proportion of symptomatic chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients compared to asymptomatic controls. 8 Owing to the introduction of fluoroquinolones as first-line antibacterial agents for CBP, higher eradication rates (70%-80%) have been reported, which have improved over the rates previously achieved by administration of cotrimoxazole (30%-65%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before each test, patients were required to cleanse thoroughly their hands and glans penis with an antiseptic soap. The samples were tested for the presence and load of traditional uropathogens (TUs; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., E. coli, other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus) [23] and 'unusual pathogens' (UPs; definition by Skerk et al [24]): Streptococcus spp., Haemophylus spp., Citrobacter spp., Coryneforms, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma spp., and others). When a patient showed at least a TU together with an UP in the context of a multiple infection localized at the prostatic level, he was considered positive for class II CBP and placed in the TU group.…”
Section: Study Design Inclusion Criteria and Diagnostic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%