2018
DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2018.1504892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of values in pre-service teachers’ intentions for professional engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
22
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study showed that intrinsic value had the highest expression in participants' motivation to engage in research. This finding aligns with the literature on the significance of interest in motivation, engagement, persistence, and academic success in various contexts (Perez et al, 2014;Robinson et al, 2018;Torsney, Lombardi, & Ponnock, 2019). When individuals engage in tasks that are intrinsically valued, there are significant psychological, cognitive, and behavioral consequences (Wigfield & Eccles, 2000).…”
Section: Values Undergraduate Researchers Attach To Their Research Exsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results of this study showed that intrinsic value had the highest expression in participants' motivation to engage in research. This finding aligns with the literature on the significance of interest in motivation, engagement, persistence, and academic success in various contexts (Perez et al, 2014;Robinson et al, 2018;Torsney, Lombardi, & Ponnock, 2019). When individuals engage in tasks that are intrinsically valued, there are significant psychological, cognitive, and behavioral consequences (Wigfield & Eccles, 2000).…”
Section: Values Undergraduate Researchers Attach To Their Research Exsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Contradicting the results of previous studies conducted on the FIT-Choice framework, the results of this study show how in the pandemic period, with teaching going virtual, job transferability has become an important point of consideration (Dhawan, 2020;Purwanto et al, 2020), which rather is of low relevance in usual times (Kilinç et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2012b;Watt & Richardson, 2007), followed by the teachers' self perception to effectively teach virtually and innovate through the processes of teaching (M = 4.26; SD = 0.925), corroborating the results of previous studies that showed that teachers' perception of their ability to teach virtually using information and communications technology (ICT) or in classrooms through traditional methods is a major motivator for their choice of teaching as their career (Akpochafo, 2020;Lin et al, 2012a;Lee et al, 2019). Social factors have been given high value as influential factors in the choice of a teaching career in studies conducted before, but in our results we see some contradiction (Wong & Moorhouse, 2020), where social contribution (M = 3.7559; SD = 0.85289) has a lower mean value in comparison to that in the previous studies (Richardson & Watt, 2006;Sharif et al, 2016;Torsney et al, 2019). The additionally identified factor such as teacher acting as the knowledge assimilator and institutional utility value came forward as one of the good influential factors.…”
Section: Results Of Descriptive and Inferential Statisticscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…For example, Watt (2006, 2016) differentiated between personal utility value (i.e., the value teachers place on the personal aspects of a teaching career) and social utility value (i.e., the utility and future outcomes of working with children and adolescents). The latter, social utility value, is seen as the consistent, positive predictor of professional engagement and job satisfaction (Torsney, Lombardi, & Ponnock, 2019).…”
Section: Diverse Faces Of Teacher Qualitymentioning
confidence: 89%