The Role of Virtual Consulting in Developing Environmentally Sustainable Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Background Health systems globally need to rapidly set and achieve targets for reaching net zero carbon emissions. Virtual consulting (including video- and telephone-based consulting) is regarded as one means by which this might be achieved, largely through reduced patient travel. Little is currently known about the ways in which forms of virtual consulting might contribute to the net zero agenda or how countries may develop and implement programs at scale that can support increased environmental sustainability. Objective In this paper, we asked, What is the impact of virtual consulting on environmental sustainability in health care? and What can we learn from current evaluations that can inform future reductions in carbon emissions? Methods We conducted a systematic review of published literature according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scopus databases using key terms relating to “carbon footprint,” “environmental impact,” “telemedicine,” and “remote consulting,” using citation tracking to identify additional articles. The articles were screened, and full texts that met the inclusion criteria were obtained. Data on the approach to carbon footprinting reported reductions in emissions, and the opportunities and challenges associated with the environmental sustainability of virtual consultations were extracted into a spreadsheet, analyzed thematically, and theorized using the Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services framework to consider the various interacting influences, including environmental sustainability, that shape the adoption of virtual consulting services. Results A total of 1672 papers were identified. After removing duplicates and screening for eligibility, 23 papers that focused on a range of virtual consulting equipment and platforms across different clinical conditions and services were included. The focus on the environmental sustainability potential of virtual consulting was unanimously reported through carbon savings achieved by a reduction in travel related to face-to-face appointments. The shortlisted papers used a range of methods and assumptions to determine carbon savings, reporting these using different units and across varied sample sizes. This limited the potential for comparison. Despite methodological inconsistencies, all papers concluded that virtual consulting significantly reduced carbon emissions. However, there was limited consideration of wider factors (eg, patient suitability, clinical indication, and organizational infrastructure) influencing the adoption, use, and spread of virtual consultations and the carbon footprint of the entire clinical pathway in which the virtual consultation was provided (eg, risk of missed diagnoses from virtual consultations that result in the need for subsequent in-person consultations or admissions). Conclusions There is overwhelming evidence that virtual consulting can reduce health care carbon emissions, largely through reducing travel related to in-person appointments. However, the current evidence fails to look at system factors associated with implementing virtual health care delivery and wider research into carbon emissions across the entire clinical pathway.

Continuity of care for patients with dementia during COVID-19 pandemic: flexibility and integration between in-person and remote visits

“…Evidence reveal escalating pressures on families and caregivers, both emotionally and financially, alongside substantial financial strains on the entire healthcare system ( 10 ). Hence, telemedicine services represent an innovative solution that lessens the burden on patients’ support networks, is more environmentally friendly, and incurs reduced costs compared to in-person appointments ( 11–13 ). While further investigations are necessary to gauge the environmental impact and social costs, telemedicine has been reported as a feasible approach to assist individuals with dementia stay connected to their service providers amid the pandemic ( 14 ).…”

Age-Inclusive Healthcare Sustainability: Romania’s Regulatory and Initiatives Landscape in the European Union Context

“…The digitalization of healthcare seems to contribute to the decrease in carbon emissions (e.g., telehealth-tele-consultation, tele-diagnosis, tele-monitoring, tele-assistance, and tele-expertise, etc.) [5,6] and reduce waste (e.g., electronic health records, electronic medical records, e-prescription, e-referrals, e-sick leave, etc.) [7,8].…”