1970
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(70)90028-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of visual imagery in desensitization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that it might be better to speak of low-imagers rather than nonimagers (McKellar, 1973) due to the fact that it is often harder to find nonimagers than imagers. In support of this, Davis, McLemore, and London (1970) found some personality differences between good and poor imagers. Future research may…”
Section: Individual Differences In Imagingsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It has been suggested that it might be better to speak of low-imagers rather than nonimagers (McKellar, 1973) due to the fact that it is often harder to find nonimagers than imagers. In support of this, Davis, McLemore, and London (1970) found some personality differences between good and poor imagers. Future research may…”
Section: Individual Differences In Imagingsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…That imaginal exposure is an effective treatment for phobic disorders has been demonstrated many times (e.g. Bandura, Blanchard and Ritter, 1969;Crowder and Thornton, 1970;Davis, McLemore and London, 1970). Comparisons of imaginal and in vivo exposure have found either in vivo exposure superior or have attributed the lack of difference between the two procedures to both groups being given self-exposure homework instructions between treatment sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are persistent suggestions that SD(R) may be superior to SD(1) (e.g., Barlow, Leitenberg, Agras, and Wincze, 1969) and at last some empirical evidence is available that SD may generalize from the laboratory to real-life (e.g., Cotler and Garlington, 1969;Ihli and Garlington, 1969). We may note also an ingenious suggestion of Davis, McLemore, and London (1970) that subjects with high visual imagery may develop phobias on a purely imaginal basis whereas low visual imagers will do so only on the basis of a reallife traumatic experience. If so, then SD(1) may be the most relevant treatment for phobias in high imaging persons whereas SD (R)may be most appropriate for low imaging persons.…”
Section: The Techniquementioning
confidence: 91%