The role of volume-load in strength and absolute endurance adaptations in adolescent’s performing high- or low-load resistance training

Steele, James; Fisher, James; Assunção, Ari R.; Bottaro, Martim; Gentil, Paulo

doi:10.1139/apnm-2016-0418

Cited by 18 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(14 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Additional Citations for Table 2A are found in the text reference list (Hettinger, 1958; Funato et al, 1986; Sewall and Micheli, 1986; Weltman et al, 1986; Blimkie, 1989; Ozmun et al, 1994; DeRenne et al, 1996; Gorostiaga et al, 1999; Sadres et al, 2001; Flanagan et al, 2002; Pikosky et al, 2002; Tsolakis et al, 2004; Drinkwater et al, 2005; Benson et al, 2007; Faigenbaum et al, 2007a, 2014, 2015; Channell and Barfield, 2008; Rhea et al, 2008; Teng et al, 2008; Chelly et al, 2009; Dorgo et al, 2009; Lubans et al, 2010; Velez et al, 2010; Wong et al, 2010; Ebada, 2011; Granacher et al, 2011a,b, 2014, 2015; Ignjatovic et al, 2011; Muehlbauer et al, 2012; Santos and Janeira, 2012; Moore et al, 2013; Moraes et al, 2013; Sander et al, 2013; Coskun and Sahin, 2014; Ferrete et al, 2014; Pesta et al, 2014; Piazza et al, 2014; Dalamitros et al, 2015; Gonzalez-Badillo et al, 2015; dos Santos Cunha et al, 2015; Sarabia et al, 2015; Tran et al, 2015; Eather et al, 2016; Harries et al, 2016; Lloyd et al, 2016; Negra et al, 2016; Prieske et al, 2016; Rodriguez-Rosell et al, 2016; Contreras et al, 2017; Steele et al, 2017; Weakley et al, 2017) .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Traditional Strength vs. Power Training on Muscle Strength, Power and Speed with Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Numerous national associations and multiple reviews have documented the safety and efficacy of strength training for children and adolescents. The literature highlights the significant training-induced increases in strength associated with youth strength training. However, the effectiveness of youth strength training programs to improve power measures is not as clear. This discrepancy may be related to training and testing specificity. Most prior youth strength training programs emphasized lower intensity resistance with relatively slow movements. Since power activities typically involve higher intensity, explosive-like contractions with higher angular velocities (e.g., plyometrics), there is a conflict between the training medium and testing measures. This meta-analysis compared strength (e.g., training with resistance or body mass) and power training programs (e.g., plyometric training) on proxies of muscle strength, power, and speed. A systematic literature search using a Boolean Search Strategy was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, SPORT Discus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar and revealed 652 hits. After perusal of title, abstract, and full text, 107 studies were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed small to moderate magnitude changes for training specificity with jump measures. In other words, power training was more effective than strength training for improving youth jump height. For sprint measures, strength training was more effective than power training with youth. Furthermore, strength training exhibited consistently large magnitude changes to lower body strength measures, which contrasted with the generally trivial, small and moderate magnitude training improvements of power training upon lower body strength, sprint and jump measures, respectively. Maturity related inadequacies in eccentric strength and balance might influence the lack of training specificity with the unilateral landings and propulsions associated with sprinting. Based on this meta-analysis, strength training should be incorporated prior to power training in order to establish an adequate foundation of strength for power training activities.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Traditional Strength vs. Power Training on Muscle Strength, Power and Speed with Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The correlations between the gagging threshold and the TPD or SWM threshold were examined via Pearson's correlation coefficient or non‐parametric Spearman's correlation coefficient. Correlation coefficients were interpreted as weak ( r = .30‐.50), moderate ( r = .50‐.70) or strong ( r > .70) . Sex differences in the mean age of participants, the mean threshold of TPD, the mean threshold of SWM and the SCL‐90‐R score were statistically analysed using two‐sample t test or Mann‐Whitney U test.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The correlation of gagging threshold with intra‐oral tactile and psychometric profiles in healthy subjects: A pilot study

Park

Byun

Jung

et al. 2020

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Excessive gag reflex could be problematic for adequate dental care. Although various factors may increase the susceptibility to gagging, its contributing factors have not been fully determined. This study aimed to determine whether gag reflex was associated with tactile sensitivity and psychological characteristics. Fifteen volunteers of healthy males and females each were recruited for this study. After completing a questionnaire describing the self‐perceived gag reflex activity, a disposable saliva ejector was inserted along the palate into the mouth until gagging was evoked. The ratio of the insertion depth to the palatal length was used as an index for the gagging threshold. The two‐point discrimination (TPD) and Semmes‐Weinstein monofilament (SWM) tests were performed to assess the tactile sensitivity of the palatal regions (hard palate, anterior and posterior soft palate). The Symptom Checklist‐90‐Revised was used to investigate the relationship between the gagging threshold and the psychological status. Our findings showed that the gagging threshold had a significant positive correlation with the TPD and SWM thresholds on the hard palate. The psychological profiles of psychoticism and hostility score were also significantly correlated with the gagging threshold. However, there were no significant differences in the tactile and gagging thresholds, as well as the psychological profiles, between males and females. Our results suggested that the tactile sensitivity of the anterior palate is a determining factor for the gagging threshold and implied that the initial response of the oral entry site to stimulation may lead to the development of gag reflex.

show abstract

“…9,10 Indeed, success in the bench press is determined by optimising the kinematics of the lift where not only can the shortest bar path be achieved in order to be biomechanically efficient 11 , but also economical in terms of neuromuscular effort 12 . Further, practising such a skill at high volumes may help to further facilitate adaptation 10,13 . It has been suggested that there are three primary mechanisms responsible for the stimulation of muscular hypertrophy (mechanical tension, metabolic stress, and muscle damage) and that optimising these may facilitate the greatest adaptations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The ‘Slingshot’ can enhance volume-loads during performance of bench press using unaided maximal loads

Niblock¹,

Steele²

2017

Journal of Trainology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To examine whether using the Slingshot will enable participants to perform a greater volume-load during bench press repetitions with a maximal load and increase set volume-load compared to an unaided condition. Summary of Background Data:Literature suggests that increased volume-loads during training may aid in improving strength, and further maximises mechanical tension and metabolic stress potentially leading to increased hypertrophy. It has been suggested that a new piece of equipment, called the Slingshot could be used in training to improve performance in the bench press by enabling individuals to increase their training volume whilst using maximal loads.Method: Nine trained male participants volunteered to participate. Each participant performed a bench press one repetition maximum (1RM) test before completing repetitions to momentary failure using the Slingshot one week later. Volume-load for each condition was calculated as repetitions (n) × load (kg).Results: A paired samples t-Test comparing between conditions revealed a significant difference (p < 0.001) between volume loads performed unaided (96.1 ± 14.6 kg) and with the Slingshot (350 ± 103.7 kg). Conclusion:Using the slingshot in training does allow individuals to perform greater volume-loads with a maximal load; however longitudinal research must be conducted to ascertain the magnitude of any potential benefit from using it.(Journal of Trainology 2017;6:47-51)

show abstract

The role of volume-load in strength and absolute endurance adaptations in adolescent’s performing high- or low-load resistance training

Cited by 18 publications

References 39 publications

Effectiveness of Traditional Strength vs. Power Training on Muscle Strength, Power and Speed with Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of Traditional Strength vs. Power Training on Muscle Strength, Power and Speed with Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The correlation of gagging threshold with intra‐oral tactile and psychometric profiles in healthy subjects: A pilot study

The ‘Slingshot’ can enhance volume-loads during performance of bench press using unaided maximal loads

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About